ACTIV-3/TICO Study Group* Background: Ensovibep (MP0420) is a designed ankyrin repeat protein, a novel class of engineered proteins, under investigation as a treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Objective: To investigate if ensovibep, in addition to remdesivir and other standard care, improves clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with standard care alone.
Background Provision of provider-specific outpatient antibiotic prescribing data has resulted in significant decreases in antibiotic use. We describe the development of reports of inpatient antibiotic prescribing by hospitalists attending on acute medical wards in VA medical facilities. Methods We created algorithms for determining the attending physician responsible for patient days present (DP), by considering changes of service (e.g., prior to admission from the emergency department) and transfers between services or physicians. Each antibiotic dose was assigned to a single attending, ward location, and service according to denominator assignment. Antibiotic use was grouped into Centers for Disease Control and Prevention drug categories and expressed as antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 DP. Data were obtained from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Algorithms were iteratively refined based on reviews of medical records from three VA medical centers and applied to acute care patients at a single site for 2018-2020. Results In 2018-2020, 294 attendings oversaw acute inpatient care for >= 14 DP. 129 attendings with >= 300 DP oversaw 88.0% of all patient care and prescribed 87.6% of all antibiotics (480 DOT/1000 DP, IQR 375-559), 90.1% of broad-spectrum therapy for hospital-onset infections (55 DOT/1000 DP, IQR 31-72) and 88.3% of resistant Gram-positive therapy (70 DOT/1000 DP, IQR 39-89) in inpatient wards. The distribution of antibiotic use for acute care ward patients amongst these 129 staff is shown in the following figure. Conclusion We developed algorithms to attribute antibiotic therapy to inpatient attendings that can be broadly applied in facilities with electronic medical records. As with outpatient prescribing, we found large variation across inpatient attendings in overall antibiotic use and broad-spectrum antibiotic use. In future work, we will obtain provider feedback of report usability and interpretability and assess whether distribution of these reports allows antibiotic stewards to favorably influence provider prescribing practices. Disclosures Matthew B. Goetz, MD, Nothing to disclose Arjun Srinivasan, MD, Nothing to disclose
W henever the principles of effective medical consultation are discussed, a classic article published in 1983 by Lee Goldman et al. is invariably referenced. In the "Ten Commandments for Effective Consultation," Goldman argued that internists should "determine the question, establish urgency, look for yourself, be as brief as appropriate, be specifi c, provide contingency plans, honor thy turf, teach with tact, provide direct personal contact, and follow up. 1 " If these Ten Commandments were followed, then the consultation would be more effective and satisfactory for both the consultant and the referring provider. However, with the advent of comanagement in 1994 where internists and surgeons have a "shared responsibility and accountability," 2 there has been a shift, and the once-concrete defi nitions of a specifi c reason for consult and the nature of "turf" have become blurred.
Background It is unclear based on published literature whether shorter courses of antibiotic treatment may be appropriate for urinary tract infections (UTI) in patients with SCI/D given their complex baseline clinical status. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the VA San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS), which has a dedicated SCI/D unit. Adults with SCI/D were identified for inclusion if they had received antibiotics for a positive urine culture in conjunction with UTI symptoms from 1/2018-12/2020. Individual UTI events were excluded if associated with potential sources of harbored infection, anatomic abnormalities increasing risk of bacteriuria, non-bacterial pathogens, concurrent infections prolonging antibiotic treatment, or antibiotic courses managed outside of VASDHS. Treatment groups comprised UTI events treated with no more than 7 days of antibiotics (group 1) versus more than 7 days (group 2). Study endpoints were recurrence or new incidence of UTI within 30 and 90 days after completion of antibiotic treatment and onset of C. difficile infection or death within 30 or 90 days, respectively, after treatment completion. Statistical tests included Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and logistic regression. Results One-hundred and seven patients with 241 unique UTI events were included in this study, with 79 events in group 1 and 162 events in group 2. Baseline characteristics were similar across both groups, aside from a higher incidence of hospital admission and more severe SCI/D based on the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale in group 2. Efficacy outcomes are described in Table 1. No deaths occurred within 90 days of treatment completion, and C. difficile infection occurred in 1 patient in group 2 after 3 days of antibiotic therapy. Duration of antibiotic therapy was not predictive of treatment failure within 30 days of antibiotic completion. Factors predictive of treatment with longer courses of antibiotic therapy included hospital admission and more severe ASIA impairment scale score. Table 1. Incidence of UTI after antibiotic completion Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that for some patients with SCI/D, UTI treatment lasting 7 days or fewer may be effective compared to longer courses of antibiotics and could be beneficial in reducing collateral damage from antibiotic use. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.