IntroductionDue to the increasing prevalence and severity of invasive candidiasis, investigators have developed clinical prediction rules to identify patients who may benefit from antifungal prophylaxis or early empiric therapy. The aims of this study were to validate and compare the Paphitou and Ostrosky-Zeichner clinical prediction rules in ICU patients in a 689-bed academic medical center.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective matched case-control study from May 2003 to June 2008 to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of each rule. Cases included adults with ICU stays of at least four days and invasive candidiasis matched to three controls by age, gender and ICU admission date. The clinical prediction rules were applied to cases and controls via retrospective chart review to evaluate the success of the rules in predicting invasive candidiasis. Paphitou's rule included diabetes, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and dialysis with or without antibiotics. Ostrosky-Zeichner's rule included antibiotics or central venous catheter plus at least two of the following: surgery, immunosuppression, TPN, dialysis, corticosteroids and pancreatitis. Conditional logistic regression was performed to evaluate the rules. Discriminative power was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC).ResultsA total of 352 patients were included (88 cases and 264 controls). The incidence of invasive candidiasis among adults with an ICU stay of at least four days was 2.3%. The prediction rules performed similarly, exhibiting low PPVs (0.041 to 0.054), high NPVs (0.983 to 0.990) and AUC ROCs (0.649 to 0.705). A new prediction rule (Nebraska Medical Center rule) was developed with PPVs, NPVs and AUC ROCs of 0.047, 0.994 and 0.770, respectively.ConclusionsBased on low PPVs and high NPVs, the rules are most useful for identifying patients who are not likely to develop invasive candidiasis, potentially preventing unnecessary antifungal use, optimizing patient ICU care and facilitating the design of forthcoming antifungal clinical trials.

Objectives: Postdural puncture headache is a challenging complication of diagnostic, therapeutic, and unintentional lumbar puncture. Literature evidence supports cosyntropin as a viable noninvasive therapy for adults who have failed conservative management, but pediatric data are limited. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to describe the use of intravenous cosyntropin for refractory pediatric postdural puncture headache at a single free-standing tertiary care pediatric hospital. Methods: Patients who had received cosyntropin were identified. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for indication, dosing information, efficacy, and side effects. The response was defined as a 50% reduction in pain score, with a secondary efficacy measure of time to discharge after the first dose. Results: Over a 5-year period, 26 patients received 37 doses of cosyntropin. Dosing ranged from 5 to 15 mcg/kg (median, 10.4 mcg/kg). There was a significant reduction in pain scores after the first dose of cosyntropin (P=0.008). Eighty-one percent of patients (n=21) achieved either a 50% reduction in pain or were discharged within 24 hours after the first dose. The median time to 50% pain reduction in 13 patients who achieved it before or discharge was 5 hours (range, 1 to 30 h). The median time to discharge after the first dose was 20 hours (range, 2 to 72 h). Ten patients received >1 dose of cosyntropin. Three patients required an epidural blood patch. No adverse effects related to treatment were identified. Discussion: This study suggests that while further research is warranted, cosyntropin is a potential alternative to epidural blood patch for pediatric patients with postdural puncture headache who fail conservative management.