The purpose of this study was to assess cost variability in the care of abdominal pain-associated functional gastrointestinal disorders (AP-FGIDS) in youth across health systems, races, and specific AP-FGID diagnoses. Patients, aged 8–17 years, with a priority 1 diagnosis corresponding to a Rome IV defined AP-FGID were identified within the Health Facts® database. Total costs were obtained across the continuum of care including outpatient clinics, emergency department, and inpatient or observation units. Cost variability was described comparing different health systems, races, and diagnoses. Thirteen thousand two hundred and fourteen patients were identified accounting for 17,287 encounters. Total costs were available for 38.7% of the encounters. There was considerable variability in costs within and, especially, across health systems. Costs also varied across race, urban vs. rural site of care, and AP-FGID diagnoses. In conclusion, there was considerable variability in the costs for care of AP-FGIDs which is sufficient to support multi-site studies to understand the value of specific tests and treatments. Significant differences in costs by race merit further investigation to understand key drivers.

No abstract

ObjectivesThe primary objective was to describe patterns of care delivery locations in youth with abdominal pain–associated functional gastrointestinal disorders (AP-FGID) and assess for differences in patterns of care delivery by sex and race. A secondary objective was to describe cost variability within the emergency department (ED).MethodsData were obtained using a large, single-vendor database that extracts and deidentifies data from the electronic health record across the outpatient, ED, and inpatient continuum of care. We evaluated patients 8 to 17 years of age seen over an 8-year period for a priority 1 diagnosis of an AP-FGID. Data collected included age, sex, race, encounter location, and total cost of ED encounters. We specifically assessed how often patients seen in the ED were also seen in outpatient or inpatient settings.ResultsA total of 53,750 patients (64% female; mean age, 13.3 ± 2.8 years) were identified and assessed. The most common location of care was the ED (48.8%) followed by the outpatient setting (46.2%). Of patients seen for a priority 1 AP-FGID diagnosis in the ED, only 3.7% were seen for a priority 1 diagnosis in the outpatient setting, and only 1% were seen in an inpatient setting. Overall, females received 42.5% of their care and males received 44.8% of their care in the ED. The overall rate of ED care was 66.9% for Hispanic, 61.5% for African American, 55.1% for Asian, 46.6% for Native American, and 36.9% for Caucasian patients.ConclusionsThe ED is the most common location for care for youth with AP-FGIDs and, for the majority, seems to be the only location. This seems to be particularly true for Hispanic and African American patients. Given the often complex psychosocial needs of this patient group, processes need to be developed to transition these patients into the outpatient setting, ideally to programs specializing in chronic pain.