Background: The impact of malnutrition on pediatric patients in the acute care setting is significant. Hospitalized patients with malnutrition have been shown to have poor clinical outcomes. Nutrition screening is the first critical step in identifying and treating malnutrition. Although several pediatric nutrition screening tools exist, none incorporate both electronic health record (EHR) compatibility and the recommended indicators of pediatric malnutrition, a gap recently identified in a systematic review by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. The aim of this study was to prove the validity of a new version of Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP), EHR-STAMP, modified for incorporation into the EHR and inclusion of updated pediatric malnutrition indicators. Methods: An interprofessional team modified the existing STAMP for integration into the EHR. Audits were performed by the research dietitian to assess accuracy and provide feedback for continuous improvement of the tool design. Results: A total of 3553 pediatric inpatients were studied from August 2017 to May 2019. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity improved with each modification to the EHR-STAMP. The final version of the EHR-STAMP found 85% accuracy, 89% sensitivity, and 97% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 60% and a negative predictive value of 94%. Conclusion: The EHR-STAMP is a highly reliable tool in the screening of nutrition risk for pediatric hospitalized patients. The tool is easy to use, EHR compatible, and incorporates the current indicators recommended for assessing pediatric malnutrition.

No abstract

Background Mental health disorders are common in youth with rheumatological disease yet optimal intervention strategies are understudied in this population. We examined patient and parent perspectives on mental health intervention for youth with rheumatological disease. Methods We conducted a mixed methods cross-sectional study, via anonymous online survey, developed by researchers together with patient/parent partners, to quantitatively and qualitatively examine youth experiences with mental health services and resources in North America. Patients ages 14–24 years with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, juvenile dermatomyositis, or systemic lupus erythematous, and parents of patients ages 8–24 with these diseases were eligible (not required to participate in pairs). Participants self-reported mental health problems (categorized into clinician-diagnosed disorders vs self-diagnosed symptoms) and treatments (e.g. therapy, medications) received for the youth. Multivariate linear regression models compared patient and parent mean Likert ratings for level of: i) comfort with mental health providers, and ii) barriers to seeking mental health services, adjusting for potential confounders (patient age, gender, disease duration, and patient/parent visual analog score for disease-related health). Participants indicated usefulness of mental health resources; text responses describing these experiences were analyzed by qualitative description. Results Participants included 123 patients and 324 parents. Patients reported clinician-diagnosed anxiety (39%) and depression (35%); another 27 and 18% endorsed self-diagnosed symptoms of these disorders, respectively. 80% of patients with clinician-diagnosed disorders reported receiving treatment, while 11% of those with self-diagnosed symptoms reported any treatment. Patients were less comfortable than parents with all mental health providers. The top two barriers to treatment for patients and parents were concerns about mental health providers not understanding the rheumatological disease, and inadequate insurance coverage. Over 60% had used patient mental health resources, and over 60% of these participants found them to be helpful, although text responses identified a desire for resources tailored to patients with rheumatological disease. Conclusion Self-reported mental health problems are prevalent for youth in this sample with rheumatological disease, and obstacles to mental health treatment include disease-related and logistic factors. Strategies are needed to improve acceptance and accessibility of mental health intervention, including routine mental health screening and availability of disease-specific mental health resources.

BackgroundMental health conditions are common in youth with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), yet intervention strategies are understudied. We used a patient-engaged approach to investigate the mental health needs of youth with SLE.MethodsAn anonymous online survey examined beliefs and experiences with mental health for youth with SLE. Eligible youth ages 14–24 years had a diagnosis of SLE and reported specific treatment for the condition. Parents of youth 8–24 years meeting the above criteria were also eligible to participate. The survey was developed in collaboration with patient and parent advisors, the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA), and the Patients, Advocates, and Rheumatology Teams Network for Research and Service (PARTNERS). Participants were recruited through the Lupus Foundation of America and CARRA clinics. We tabulated youth responses for i) self-reported prevalence of mental health problems, categorized into mutually exclusive clinician-diagnosed disorders and self-diagnosed symptoms, and ii) mean Likert ratings (0=low, 4=high) for the impact of disease related-factors on their mental health. We also compared youth and parent responses using regression models to examine comfort level with potential mental health providers.Results102 respondents included 59 patients (58%) and 43 (42%) parents. Youth had a mean age of 20.9 (standard deviation, SD=3.4) years, and mean disease duration of 6.9 (SD 4.0) years. History of a mental health problem was reported by 21 youth (36%), of which 66% said that their rheumatologist was unaware. Clinician-diagnosed anxiety was reported by 19%, depression by 12%, and adjustment disorders by 19%; another 17%, 8% and 10% had self-reported symptoms of these disorders, respectively. Mean Likert ratings by youth indicated that disease aspects most impacting mental health were worry about disease impact on the future at 3.0 (SD 1.2), worry about having a flare at 2.9 (1.2), and worry about medication side effects at 2.8 (1.3). Youth and parents felt most comfortable discussing mental health concerns with rheumatologists and primary care providers, and least comfortable with social workers and school counselors (figure 1).Abstract 92 Figure 1Comparison of level of comfort with potential mental health providers among youth patients with SLE and parents. Results are shown for linear regression models comparing Likert scores among youth patients and parents, adjusted for disease duration and patient/parent-reported visual assessment score for disease-related health. *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001ConclusionsYouth with SLE have high rates of diagnosed and undiagnosed mental health problems, which are impacted by their disease. Mental health intervention strategies in rheumatology settings may improve mental health education, screening and treatment for these youth.Funding Source(s):The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance

No abstract