No abstract

Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in learning how colour vision has evolved. This trend has been fuelled by an enhanced understanding of the nature and extent of colour vision among contemporary species, by a deeper understanding of the paleontological record and by the application of new tools from molecular biology. This review provides an assessment of the progress in understanding the evolution of vertebrate colour vision. In so doing, we offer accounts of the evolution of three classes of mechanism important for colour vision--photopigment opsins, oil droplets and retinal organisation--and then examine details of how colour vision has evolved among mammals and, more specifically, among primates.

Most platyrrhine monkeys have a triallelic M0L opsin gene polymorphism that underlies significant individual variations in color vision. A survey of the frequencies of these polymorphic genes suggests that the three alleles occur with equal frequency among squirrel monkeys (subfamily Cebinae), but are not equally frequent in a number of species from the subfamily Callitrichinae. This departure from equal frequency in the Callitrichids should slightly increase the ratio of dichromats to trichromats in the population and significantly alter the relative representation of the three possible dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes. A particular feature of the inequality is that it leads to a relative increase in the number of trichromats whose M0L pigments have the largest possible spectral separation. To assess whether these trichromatic phenotypes are equally well equipped to make relevant visual discriminations, psychophysical experiments were run on human observers. A technique involving the functional substitution of photopigments was used to simulate the discrimination between fruits among a background of leaves. The goal of the simulation was to reproduce in the cones of human observers excitations equivalent to those produced in monkey cones as the animals view fruit. Three different viewing conditions were examined involving variations in the relative luminances of fruit and leaves and the spectrum of the illuminant. In all cases, performance was best for simulated trichromacies including M0L pigments with the largest spectral separation. Thus, the inequality of opsin gene frequency in Callitrichid monkeys may reflect adaptive pressures.

A key to understanding animal behavior is knowledge of the sensory information animals extract from their environment. For visually motivated tasks, the information animals obtain through their eyes is often assumed to be essentially the same as that perceived by humans. However, known differences in structure and processing among the visual systems of different animals clearly indicate that the world seen by each is different. A well-characterized difference between human and other animal visual systems is the number of types and spectral sensitivities of their photoreceptors. We are developing a technique, functional substitution, that exploits knowledge of these differences to portray for human subjects, colors as they would appear through the photoreceptors of another animal. In a specific application, we ask human subjects to rank hues of male threespine stickleback (Ggasterosteus aculeatus) throats viewed through stickleback photopigments. We compare these ranks to ranks of the same throat hues viewed through normal human photoreceptors. We find essentially no difference between the two sets of rankings. This suggests that any differences in human and stickleback rankings of such hues would result from differences in post-receptoral neural processing. Using a previously developed model of stickleback neural processing, we established another ranking of the hues which was again essentially the same as the rankings produced by the human subjects. A growing literature indicates that stickleback do rank such hues in the evaluation of males as potential mates or threats. Although our results do not demonstrate that humans and stickleback use the same mechanisms to assess color, our experiments significantly failed to show that stickleback and human rankings of throat hues should be different. Nevertheless, a comparison of all these rankings to ranks derived from subjective color scoring suggests that color scoring may utilize other cues and should thus be used cautiously.

X-linked photopigment polymorphism produces six different color vision phenotypes in most species of New World monkey. In the subfamily Callitrichinae, the three M/L alleles underlying these different phenotypes are present at unequal frequencies suggesting that selective pressures other than heterozygous-advantage operate on these alleles. Earlier we investigated this hypothesis with functional substitution, a technique using a computer monitor to simulate colors as they would appear to humans with monkey visual pigments (Visual Neuroscience 21:217-222, 2004). The stimuli were derived from measurements of ecologically relevant fruit and foliage. We found that discrimination performance depended on the relative spectral positioning of the substituted M and L pigment pair. Here we have undertaken a systematic examination of two simulation parameters--test field luminance and stimulus duration. Discriminability of the fruit colors depended on which phenotype was simulated but only at short stimulus durations and/or low luminances. Under such conditions, phenotypes with the larger pigment peak separations performed better. At longer durations and higher luminances, differences in performance across different substitutions tended to disappear. The stimuli used in this experiment were analyzed with several color discrimination models. There was limited agreement among the predictions made by these models regarding the capabilities of animals with different pigment pairs and none predicted the dependence of discrimination on changes in luminance and stimulus duration.