BackgroundAt present, scientific consensus exists on the multifactorial etiopatogenia of obesity. Both professionals and researchers agree that treatment must also have a multifactorial approach, including diet, physical activity, pharmacology and/or surgical treatment. These two last ones should be reserved for those cases of morbid obesities or in case of failure of the previous ones. The aim of the PRONAF study is to determine what type of exercise combined with caloric restriction is the most appropriate to be included in overweigth and obesity intervention programs, and the aim of this paper is to describe the design and the evaluation methods used to carry out the PRONAF study.Methods/designOne-hundred nineteen overweight (46 males) and 120 obese (61 males) subjects aged 18–50 years were randomly assigned to a strength training group, an endurance training group, a combined strength + endurance training group or a diet and physical activity recommendations group. The intervention period was 22 weeks (in all cases 3 times/wk of training for 22 weeks and 2 weeks for pre and post evaluation). All subjects followed a hypocaloric diet (25-30% less energy intake than the daily energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry). 29–34% of the total energy intake came from fat, 14–20% from protein, and 50–55% from carbohydrates. The mayor outcome variables assesed were, biochemical and inflamatory markers, body composition, energy balance, physical fitness, nutritional habits, genetic profile and quality of life. 180 (75.3%) subjects finished the study, with a dropout rate of 24.7%. Dropout reasons included: personal reasons 17 (28.8%), low adherence to exercise 3 (5.1%), low adherence to diet 6 (10.2%), job change 6 (10.2%), and lost interest 27 (45.8%).DiscussionFeasibility of the study has been proven, with a low dropout rate which corresponds to the estimated sample size. Transfer of knowledge is foreseen as a spin-off, in order that overweight and obese subjects can benefit from the results. The aim is to transfer it to sports centres. Effectiveness on individual health-related parameter in order to determine the most effective training programme will be analysed in forthcoming publications.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01116856

exercise testing oxygen uptake pulmonary hypertension ■ PURPOSE: To determine whether the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a predictor of peak oxygen uptake (Vo 2 ) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH).■ METHODS: A total of 157 patients treated for IPAH completed a 6MWT in accordance with American Thoracic Society standards. Heart rate, pulse oximetry, and Borg rating of perceived exertion were determined at baseline and posttest. A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was performed on a cycle ergometer using a ramp protocol. Participants were stratified post hoc by age into 3 groups: children (n = 26), adolescents (n = 49), and adults (n = 82). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict peak Vo 2 from the 6MWT.■ RESULTS: The regression equation generated for the children was the only model to strongly predict peak Vo 2 (r = 0.87; P < .001). Similar models for adolescent (r = 0.59; P < .001) and adult groups (r = 0.68; P < .001) did not achieve the same level of correlation.■ CONCLUSION: Six-Minute Walk Test was able to accurately predict peak Vo 2 in children (6-12 years) with IPAH; however, the model was weaker for predicting peak Vo 2 in older populations. These findings suggest that 6MWT may be as valid a test for predicting peak Vo 2 in children with IPAH as CPET measured peak Vo 2 . In older IPAH populations, CPET is the only reliable method for the evaluation of peak Vo 2 . The cardiopulmonary response to exercise is an important clinical assessment tool, as it provides an integrated assessment of the respiratory, cardiac, and metabolic systems. The current gold standard method for assessing aerobic exercise response in humans is the maximum incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Peak V o 2 , measured by a CPET, has been widely used to assess functional capacity and predict survival in patients with advanced symptomatic heart failure and respiratory dysfunction. 1,2 However, CPET requires the use of expensive equipment and trained medical team supervision to conduct and evaluate each test. Submaximal tests, like the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), provide useful information on daily physical performance that are safe, simple, standardized, and inexpensive. The 6MWT offers a better estimation of daily living activities than other walk tests 3 and the American Thoracic Society has endorsed and published guidelines for performing the 6MWT in clinical settings. 4

Background: The increase in exercise levels in the last few years among professional and recreational female athletes has led to an increased scientific interest about sports health and performance in the female athlete population. The purpose of the IronFEMME Study described in this protocol article is to determine the influence of different hormonal profiles on iron metabolism in response to endurance exercise, and the main markers of muscle damage in response to resistance exercise; both in eumenorrheic, oral contraceptive (OC) users and postmenopausal well-trained women. Methods: This project is an observational controlled randomized counterbalanced study. One hundered and four (104) active and healthy women were selected to participate in the IronFEMME Study, 57 of which were eumenorrheic, 31 OC users and 16 postmenopausal. The project consisted of two sections carried out at the same time: iron metabolism (study I) and muscle damage (study II). For the study I, the exercise protocol consisted of an interval running test (eight bouts of 3 min at 85% of the maximal aerobic speed), whereas the study II protocol was an eccentric-based resistance exercise protocol (10 sets of 10 repetitions of plate-loaded barbell parallel back squats at 60% of their one repetition maximum (1RM) with 2 min of recovery between sets). In both studies, eumenorrheic participants were evaluated at three specific moments of the menstrual cycle: early-follicular phase, late-follicular phase and mid-luteal phase; OC users performed the trial at two moments: withdrawal phase and active pill phase. Lastly, postmenopausal women were only tested once, since their hormonal status does not fluctuate. The three-step method was used to verify the menstrual cycle phase: calendar counting, blood test confirmation, and urine-based ovulation kits. Blood samples were obtained to measure sex hormones, iron metabolism parameters, and muscle damage related markers. Discussion: IronFEMME Study has been designed to increase the knowledge regarding the influence of sex hormones on some aspects of the exercise-related female physiology. Iron metabolism and exercise-induced muscle damage will be studied considering the different reproductive status present throughout well-trained females’ lifespan.