The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of polyphenol reduction in a food formulated with Eisenia arborea and its effect on the feeding preference of the abalone Haliotis fulgens through multiple selection tests. Two foods were formulated: one without polyphenol reduction (EA01) and one with polyphenol reduction (EA02). Rehydrated E. arborea (ER03) was used as the control food. The polyphenol content was quantified in EA01 and EA02, and the stability and hardness of all three foods were measured at 24 h. Food preference was evaluated through attraction and consumption tests on day 1, 6, and 12. The polyphenol concentration was reduced by 41% in EA02 (13.9 mg GAE/g) compared to that of EA01 (33.3 mg GAE/g). Both formulated foods showed 88% stability and hardness values > 680 g cm− 2, which were greater than those of the control (ER03, 66% and 285 g cm− 2, respectively). Abalone were more attracted to EA02 and ER03 on day 1, 6, and 12 than to ER03 on the same days. A similar trend was observed with consumption. EA02 and ER03 were the most consumed foods (> 6 g/day) throughout the experiment, and no significant differences in consumption were observed between these foods. On the other hand, juvenile H. fulgens showed a greater attraction to and consumption of EA02 (reduced polyphenol content) than EA01 (no reduction in polyphenol content). This allows us to conclude that EA02 can replace rehydrated algae as a suitable food source for juvenile H. fulgens.
Evaluation of the acceptability of diets formulated with hydrolyzed algae for juvenile abalone of Haliotis fulgens Evaluación de la aceptabilidad de dietas formuladas con algas hidrolizadas para juveniles de abulón Haliotis fulgens
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.