This article presents a heap space analysis for (sequential) Java bytecode. The analysis generates heap space cost relations which define at compile-time the heap consumption of a program as a function of its data size. These relations can be used to obtain upper bounds on the heap space allocated during the execution of the different methods. In addition, we describe how to refine the cost relations, by relying on escape analysis, in order to take into account the heap space that can be safely deallocated by the garbage collector upon exit from a corresponding method. These refined cost relations are then used to infer upper bounds on the active heap space upon methods return. Example applications for the analysis consider inference of constant heap usage and heap usage proportional to the data size (including polynomial and exponential heap consumption). Our prototype implementation is reported and demonstrated by means of a series of examples which illustrate how the analysis naturally encompasses standard data-structures like lists, trees and arrays with several dimensions written in object-oriented programming style.

State of the art analyzers in the Logic Programming (LP) paradigm are nowadays mature and sophisticated. They allow inferring a wide variety of global properties including termination, bounds on resource consumption, etc. The aim of this work is to automatically transfer the power of such analysis tools for LP to the analysis and verification of Java bytecode (jvml). In order to achieve our goal, we rely on well-known techniques for meta-programming and program specialization. More precisely, we propose to partially evaluate a jvml interpreter implemented in LP together with (an LP representation of) a jvml program and then analyze the residual program. Interestingly, at least for the examples we have studied, our approach produces very simple LP representations of the original jvml programs. This can be seen as a decompilation from jvml to high-level LP source. By reasoning about such residual programs, we can automatically prove in the CiaoPP system some non-trivial properties of jvml programs such as termination, run-time error freeness and infer bounds on its resource consumption. We are not aware of any other system which is able to verify such advanced properties of Java bytecode.

The accurate prediction of program's memory requirements is a critical component in software development. Existing heap space analyses either do not take deallocation into account or adopt specific models of garbage collectors which do not necessarily correspond to the actual memory usage. We present a novel approach to inferring upper bounds on memory requirements of Java-like programs which is parametric on the notion of object lifetime, i.e., on when objects become collectible. If objects lifetimes are inferred by a reachability analysis, then our analysis infers accurate upper bounds on the memory consumption for a reachability-based garbage collector. Interestingly, if objects lifetimes are inferred by a heap liveness analysis, then we approximate the program minimal memory requirement, i.e., the peak memory usage when using an optimal garbage collector which frees objects as soon as they become dead. The key idea is to integrate information on objects lifetimes into the process of generating the recurrence equations which capture the memory usage at the different program states. If the heap size limit is set to the memory requirement inferred by our analysis, it is ensured that execution will not exceed the memory limit with the only assumption that garbage collection works when the limit is reached. Experiments on Java bytecode programs provide evidence of the feasibility and accuracy of our analysis.

Abstract. We present the main concepts, usage and implementation of SACO, a static analyzer for concurrent objects. Interestingly, SACO is able to infer both liveness (namely termination and resource boundedness) and safety properties (namely deadlock freedom) of programs based on concurrent objects. The system integrates auxiliary analyses such as points-to and may-happen-in-parallel, which are essential for increasing the accuracy of the aforementioned more complex properties. SACO provides accurate information about the dependencies which may introduce deadlocks, loops whose termination is not guaranteed, and upper bounds on the resource consumption of methods.

No abstract