BackgroundBisphosphonates are drugs used in the treatment of lytic bone metastases, multiple myeloma, hypercalcemia of malignant origin, osteoporosis, and diseases such as Paget’s disease. Recently osteonecrosis of the jaw has been associated with the use of bisphosphonates. This study describes the imaging findings of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws.Patients and methodsEleven patients, receiving bisphosphonate medication for approximately 28 months, with pain on affected side, nonhealing extraction sockets, purulent discharge and swelling in soft tissue were examined. Imaging consisted of non-contrast enhanced CT and contrast enhanced MRI. All patients underwent surgery of affected bone and histology confirmed osteonecrosis.ResultsCT scan showed osteolytic and sclerotic lesions with cortical bone destruction in all patients. The osteonecrosis was identified as delimited focal lesions with reduction of the signal on T1- weighted imaging and T2- weighted imaging. All the patients had soft-tissue involvement with enhancement in orbicular, buccinator muscle of the mouth or masticator space and adenopathy in submandibular and jugular digastric chain.ConclusionsBisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaw presents a variety of imaging findings that help to determine the extent of the disease and track the progression, however they are not specific for this disease.

No abstract

Background: Craniosynostosis is a rare congenital disease of the skull. They arise when one or more cranial sutures ossify prematurely. This causes an obstruction to normal brain growth and leads to specific deformations of the skull, which may result in intracranial hypertension and cognitive delay. Materials and methods: We have retrospectively analysed all children treated at the Unit of paediatric neurosurgery of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between June 2015 and September 2020. The following items have been recorded: affected suture, underlying syndromic condition, hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, raised intracranial pressure, age at surgery, surgical technique, need for multiple operations and surgical complications. Results: During the study period, 71 children have been treated for craniosynostosis. The median postoperative follow-up was 31 months. There were: 54.9% sagittal, 25.3% metopic, 14.0% unicoronal, 1.4% bicoronal and 1.4% unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis. Multiple sutures were affected in 2.8% cases. 7.0% of the cases were syndromic. Overall, 74 surgical procedures have been performed: frontoorbital advancement represented 40.5% of them; biparietal remodelling 32.4%: total cranial vault remodelling 22.9%; posterior distraction 2.7%; posterior expansion 1.3%. Median age at surgery was 12.8 months. Conclusions: The treatment of craniosynostosis is surgical and requires a multidisciplinary approach, with expertise in plastic and reconstructive surgery, maxillofacial surgery and neurosurgery. The aim of surgical treatment is to release the constrictive and deformative effect that the synostosis has on skull growth. This requires a remodelling of the neurocranium and, if necessary, of the viscerocranium. Beyond aesthetic purposes, the primary aim of surgical treatment is to permit a normal development of the brain.

No abstract

No abstract