No abstract

<p>Drained peatlands have peculiar hydrological properties and cause environmental concerns due to carbon dioxide emissions and nutrient fluxes resulting from decomposition of organic matter in peat. As peat degradation is strongly controlled by soil moisture conditions, it is assumed that flexible water management methods, such as controlled drainage, can be used to reduce the environmental impacts of drained peatlands in agriculture. While peat soils have been extensively researched, there is a need for increased understanding about the hydrological responses of peatlands to various water management schemes. Research is needed to quantify these responses, and a promising approach is to exploit simulation models for describing peatland hydrology at field scale. The goal was to calibrate and validate a hydrological model FLUSH to describe the hydrology of an agricultural field block having a shallow peat cover and managed with controlled drainage. FLUSH is a spatially distributed three-dimensional (3D) process model which simulates the hydrology of agricultural fields managed with controlled subsurface drains and open ditches. The soil description of FLUSH includes both soil matrix and macropores accounting preferential flow. Richards equation and Mualem-van Genuchten water retention model are applied for subsurface flow. The modeled field block is located in Ruukki, northwestern Finland, and the study period was from August 2018 to October 2021. Groundwater table depth and drain discharge observations were used for the calibration and validation. The Kling-Gupta efficiencies for the simulated groundwater table depths in soil matrix and macropore domains were 0.50 and 0.47, respectively, during the calibration period, and 0.23 and 0.33 during the validation period. The efficiency values for the simulated drain discharge during the calibration and validation periods were 0.18 and 0.19, respectively. Limiting the modeled area to the block lead to cumulative drain discharges clearly smaller than the observations. The underprediction was improved by extending the modeled area beyond the block, which suggested a presence of a hydrological connection in terms of groundwater flux originating from outside the block. Thus, the surrounding environment can play a role in the hydrology of peatland fields, and this should be considered in water management design. Despite the large difference between observed and simulated cumulative drain discharges, the main hydrological dynamics were captured, and the model formed a useful tool to simulate drainage scenarios in peatlands and to study the role of the surrounding areas on field hydrology.</p>

No abstract

No abstract