Both sulphonylureas (SU) and metformin (MET) reduce hyperglycaemia in patients with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, but they do so by entirely different mechanisms. Therefore, SU and MET can be combined, and a few controlled studies have shown pronounced reductions in hyperglycaemia following treatment with this combination [1±3]. As SU and MET also have beneficial long-term effects on diabetic microvascular disease [4,5] and MET even on macrovascular disease [5], it would seem logical to presume that the combination of SU and MET would be highly beneficial for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke in patients with Type II diabetes. A UKPDS substudy instead reported a higher risk of diabetes-related death with this type of combination therapy compared with SU therapy alone [5]. Therefore, we decided to analyse cause- Diabetologia (2000) 43: 558±560 Articles Short communicationIncreased mortality in Type II diabetic patients using sulphonylurea and metformin in combination: a population-based observational study

Increased c-f PWV is associated with increased incidence of diabetes, independent of other risk factors. These results suggest that increased arterial stiffness is an early risk marker for developing diabetes.

Background:Arterial stiffness plays a fundamental role in the development of hypertension and is a risk factor for both cardiovascular disease and mortality. The stiffening that occurs with increasing age has, in numerous cross-sectional studies, been shown to be associated with several cardiovascular risk factors. This observational study aims to characterize the predictive and cross-sectional markers focusing on the non-hemodynamic component of arterial stiffness.Method:In all, 2679 men and women from Malmö, Sweden, were examined at baseline during 1991–1994, and again at follow-up during 2007–2012 (mean age 72 years, 38% men). Follow-up examination included measurement of arterial stiffness by carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (c-fPWV), after a mean period of 17 years. The associations between c-fPWV and risk markers were calculated with multiple linear regression.Results:The results indicated that for both sexes, waist circumference (β = 0.17, P < 0.001), fasting glucose (β = 0.13, P < 0.001), Homeostatic Model Assessment – Insulin Resistance (β = 0.10, P < 0.001), triglycerides (β = 0.10, P < 0.001), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (β = −0.08, P < 0.001) were all predictors of cfPWV adjusted for mean arterial pressure and heart rate, as well as for classical cardiovascular risk factors and drug treatment. There were no associations between baseline or follow-up low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, or eGFR and c-fPWV.Conclusion:The non-hemodynamic cluster of risk markers and predictors of arterial stiffness in a middle-aged population includes abdominal obesity, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia, but not smoking and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. This pattern existed in both sexes.