The article is devoted to the formation of mechanisms for the development of innovative activity in the industry of Russia. The paper identifies factors that impede the transition of industrial production to an innovative development path, among which the authors highlighted a drop in investment in the Russian economy, a lack of staff and an imperfection of infrastructure support, and a decrease in the commercial interest of industrial enterprises. Based on the results, a system of innovative development of industrial production was proposed, which consists in a balance of negative and positive factors, as well as the need for the participation of the private sector, government agencies and public institutions in shaping the prerequisites for the transition of the economy to an innovative development path. In conclusion, the study presents the main findings and results of the work.

Аннотация. В статье рассмотрено построение макроэкономических производственных функций российской экономики для сектора естественных монополий и конкурентного сектора экономики. Показано, что для построения эффективной системы государственного регулирования экономики Российской Федерации, основанной на использовании естественных монополий как основного инструмента управления конкурентной экономикой, необходимо использование эффекта экономии на масштабе производства, который должен быть отражен в производственной функции естественно-монопольного сектора. Разработана методика отражения эффекта экономии на масштабе в производственной функции, и эконометрическими методами построены производственные функции двух секторов российской экономики с учетом этого эффекта. Данные производственные функции предлагается использовать при разработке системы косвенного государственного регулирования экономики Российской Федерации. Ключевые слова: производственная функция, экономия на масштабе, естественные монополии, государственное регулирование, конкурентный сектор.

No abstract

The article considers options for achieving market equilibrium in the oligopolistic market of goods with saturated demand. Cooperation and competition of oligopolistic producers are the most important factors influencing the characteristics of the market in question. The article developed a game theoretic model of such a market, and with its help various options for interaction between manufacturers were investigated. It has been established that the main parameters affecting the position of the manufacturer on the market are its production capabilities and the level of technologies used. It has been shown that non-cooperative equilibrium in such a market is possible only if strict antitrust measures are observed. Characteristics of such equilibrium were found. Various options for cooperative behavior of manufacturers have been investigated. With the help of the model proposed in the work, it is shown that on the studied market from a game theoretical point of view it is possible to appear equilibrium states of different nature: equilibrium by Stackelberg and Nash, as well as strong equilibrium. The article identifies the states under which these conditions arise in the market, and identifies the characteristics of these equilibrium states. The possibility of achieving market equilibrium based on threats has been studied separately. It has been established that the ratio of production capabilities of oligopolists who are market participants plays a decisive role in achieving a stable market state.

A quantitative comparison of the optimal characteristics of two schemes of construction of the gas industry of the national economy, using mathematical modeling – a scheme with full vertical integration of the industry and a scheme with a vertical division of the industry into a competitive gas production sector and a gas transportation system, which is a natural monopoly сore of the industry – has been carried out. It has been established, that allocation of the competitive making sector can give small increase in total amount of gas production and the same reduction of price for the end user, but can lead to decrease in investments into the development of the industry. It has been concluded, that the decision on a form of existence of the industry demands joint consideration both economic and political aspects of the problem.