No abstract

No abstract

A considerable number of patients infected with Hepatitis C virus subtype 1b (HCV‐1b) do not respond to pegylated interferon/ribavirin combination therapy. In this study we explored a useful factor(s) to predict treatment outcome. A total of 47 HCV‐1b‐infected patients were treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin for 48 weeks. Sera of the patients were examined for the entire NS5A sequence of the HCV genome, HCV RNA titers and anti‐NS5A antibodies. According to their responses, the patients were divided into two groups, early viral responders who cleared the virus by week 16 (EVR[16w]) and those who did not (Non‐EVR[16w]). The mean number of mutations in the V3 region (aa 2356 to 2379) or that in the V3 region plus its N‐terminally flanking region, which we refer to as interferon/ribavirin resistance‐determining region (IRRDR; aa 2334 to 2379), of NS5A obtained from the pretreatment sera was significantly larger for EVR(16w) compared with Non‐EVR(16w). Moreover, HCV‐1b isolates with ≥5 mutations in V3 or those with ≥6 mutations in IRRDR were almost exclusively found in EVR(16w). Also, the presence of detectable levels of anti‐NS5A antibodies in the pretreatment sera was closely associated with EVR(16w). In conclusion, a high degree of sequence variation in V3 (≥5) or IRRDR (≥6) and the presence of detectable levels of anti‐NS5A antibodies in the pretreatment sera would be useful factors to predict EVR(16w). On the other hand, a less diverse sequence in V3 (≤4) or IRRDR (≤5) together with the absence of detectable anti‐NS5A antibodies could be a predictive factor for Non‐EVR(16w).

BackgroundThe majority of dengue patients infected with any serotype of dengue virus (DENV) are asymptomatic, but the remainder may develop a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms, ranging from mild dengue fever (DF) to severe dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). Severe cases occur more often in patients who experience a secondary infection with a different virus serotype. A phenomenon called antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) has been proposed to explain the onset of these severe cases, but the exact mechanism of ADE remains unclear.Methodology/Principal FindingVirus neutralization and ADE assays were performed using ultracentrifugation supernatants of acute-phase sera from patients with secondary infections or human monoclonal antibodies (HuMAbs) as anti-DENV antibodies. Virus sources included infectious serum-derived viruses from the ultracentrifugation precipitates, laboratory-culture adapted DENV, or recombinant DENVs derived from patient sera. In contrast to the high levels of ADE observed with laboratory virus strains, low ADE was observed with autologous patient-derived viruses, when patient sera were used to provide the antibody component in the ADE assays. Similar results were obtained using samples from DF and DHF patients. Recombinant-viruses derived from DHF patients showed only minor differences in neutralization and ADE activity in the presence of HuMAbs or plasma derived from the same DHF patient.Conclusion/SignificanceSerum or plasma taken from patients during the acute phase of a secondary infection showed high levels of ADE, but no neutralization activity, when assayed in the presence of laboratory-adapted virus strains. By contrast, serum or plasma from the same patient showed high levels of neutralization activity but failed to induce significant ADE when the assays were performed with autologous virus. These results demonstrate the significance of the virus source when measuring ADE. They also suggest that repeated passage of DENV in cell culture has endowed it with the capacity to induce high levels of ADE.