We examined the effectiveness of trabeculectomy in decreasing the slope of mean deviation (MD) in Japanese patients with progressive normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) at low intraocular pressure (IOP) levels. The charts of patients who had undergone initial trabeculectomy with adjunctive mitomycin C for progressive NTG with medically controlled IOP < 15 mmHg in 2010–2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen eyes of 13 NTG patients who had undergone at least 5 times of visual field (VF) examinations in both of preoperatively and postoperatively with postoperative follow-up of ≥ 2 years were enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative MD slopes were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of trabeculectomy in slowing progression of VF. Mean IOP (8.1 ± 2.9 mmHg) and number of IOP-lowering medications (0.8 ± 1.5) were significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (13.9 ± 0.9 mmHg; P < 0.001 and 3.0± 0.4; P < 0.0001). In total, 91.7% of eyes with single-digit IOP postoperatively showed improvement in MD slope, whereas only 20.0% of eyes with IOP ≥ 10 mmHg postoperatively showed the improvement. Three eyes (17.6%) showed a decrease in visual acuity (VA) of ≥ 0.1 unit; this group had a lower mean postoperative IOP (6.0 ± 1.0 vs. 8.6 ± 3.0 mmHg; P = 0.1717) and a higher mean IOP reduction rate (56.2 vs. 38.5%; P = 0.8296) than eyes with a VA decrease of < 0.1 unit or no change. Thus, in this analysis of Japanese NTG patients with medically controlled IOP < 15 mmHg, achieving an IOP < 10 mmHg with trabeculectomy was beneficial for reducing the VF progression rate in progressive NTG at low IOP levels. However, an IOP < 7 mmHg by surgery would be required careful attention to VA decline.
Met98Lys is a risk-associated alteration for open-angle glaucoma, including POAG and NTG, in the Japanese population as initially reported. The amino acid-preserving polymorphism, c.412G > A, may be a genetic risk factor for the progression of open- angle glaucoma in this Japanese population.
BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of fixed-combination brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% (BRINZ/TIM-FC) compared with concomitant brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5% (BRINZ + TIM) in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma (primary open-angle, exfoliation, pigmentary) or ocular hypertension.MethodsThis randomized, double-masked, multicenter, parallel-group, positive-control, Phase III study was conducted in Japan and included patients aged ≥20 years. Baseline intraocular pressure was assessed after 4 weeks of treatment with timolol 0.5%. Patients were randomized to twice-daily BRINZ/TIM-FC or BRINZ + TIM for 8 weeks (treatment phase). The primary endpoint was mean intraocular pressure reduction from baseline to week 8 at 11 am, at which time noninferiority of BRINZ/TIM-FC versus BRINZ + TIM was evaluated. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of covariance and t-tests. Adverse events and ophthalmic/physiologic variables were assessed.ResultsIn total, 319 patients of mean age 64±12 years were enrolled in the treatment phase. BRINZ/TIM-FC and BRINZ + TIM were associated with reductions in mean intraocular pressure from baseline throughout the study (ranges −2.5 to −3.4 mmHg and −2.7 to −3.3 mmHg, respectively). Mean between-group differences in intraocular pressure reduction ranged from 0 to −0.3 mmHg; the upper limit of the 97.5% confidence interval for week 8 at 11 am was <1.1 mmHg, indicating noninferiority of BRINZ/TIM-FC. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 3% and 12% of patients receiving BRINZ/TIM-FC and BRINZ + TIM, respectively. No substantial changes in other safety parameters were reported.ConclusionTwice-daily BRINZ/TIM-FC reduced intraocular pressure by levels similar to concomitant BRINZ + TIM in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and was noninferior to BRINZ + TIM. Both treatments were well tolerated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.