ObjectiveTo characterize dropouts from type-2 diabetes (T2D) care in communal primary health care.DesignAn observational study.SettingIn a Finnish city, patients with T2D who had not contacted the public primary health care system during the past 12 months were identified with a computer based search and contacted by a trained diabetes nurse.SubjectsDropouts from T2D treatment.Main outcome measuresDemographic factors, laboratory parameters, examinations, medications, and comorbidities.ResultsOf the patients with T2D, 10% (n = 356) were dropouts and 60% of them were men. Median HbA1c was 6.5 (QR for 25% and 75%: 6.0, 7.7) %, (45 [42,61] mmol/mol). Of the dropouts, 14% had HbA1c ≥ 9.0% (75 mmol/mol), and these patients were younger than the other dropouts (mean age 54.4 [SD 10.8] years vs. 60.6 [9.4] years, p < 0.001). Median low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level was 2.8 (QR 2.1, 3.4) mmol/l. Median systolic blood pressure (BP) was 142 (QR 130, 160) mm Hg. Median diastolic BP was 86 (78, 94) mm Hg. Of the dropouts, 83% had comorbidities and 62% were prescribed metformin as a treatment.ConclusionsTen percent of T2D patients were dropouts of whom those with a poor glycaemic control were younger than the other dropouts. BP and LDL cholesterol concentrations were non-optimal among the majority of the dropouts. Metformin was prescribed less frequently to the dropouts than is usual for T2D patients. The comorbidities were equally common among the dropouts as among the other T2D patients.Key Points Which kinds of patients are dropouts from type-2 diabetes care is not known.• One-tenth of the patients with T2D were dropouts and they generally had good glycaemic control.• Blood pressure and LDL cholesterol concentrations were non-optimal among the majority of the dropouts.• Fourteen percent of these dropouts had HbA1c > 9% (75 mmol/mol) and they were more often younger than the other dropouts.

BackgroundIn Finland diabetologists have long been concerned about the level of diabetes care as the incidence of type 1 diabetes and complicated type 2 diabetes is exceeding the capacity of specialist clinics. We compared the outcome of diabetes care in two middle-sized Finnish municipalities with different models of diabetes care organisation in public primary health care. In Kouvola the primary health care of all diabetic patients is based on general practitioners, whereas in Nurmijärvi the follow-up of type 1 and most complicated type 2 diabetic patients is assigned to a general practitioner specialised in diabetes care.MethodsOur study population consisted of all adult diabetic patients living in the municipalities under review.We compared the use and costs of public diabetes care, glycemic control, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol level, the application of the national guidelines and patient satisfaction. The main outcome measures were the costs and use of health care services due to diabetes and its complications.ResultsIn Nurmijärvi, where diabetes care was centralised, more type 1 diabetic patients were followed up in primary health care than in Kouvola, where general practitioners need more specialist consultations. The centralisation resulted in cost savings in the diabetes care of type 1 diabetic patients. Although the quality of care was similar, type 1 diabetic patients were more satisfied with their follow-up in the centralised system. In the care of type 2 diabetic patients the centralised system required fewer specialist consultations, but the quality and costs were similar in both models.ConclusionsThe follow-up of most diabetic patients – including type 1 diabetes – can be organised in primary health care with the same quality as in secondary care units. The centralised primary care of type 1 diabetes is less costly and requires fewer specialist consultations.

Objective. To study one-year incidence and risk factors of severe hypoglycaemias (SH) in adult drug-treated diabetic patients living in two Finnish communities. Design. The episodes of SH and their risk factors were identifi ed from local ambulance registers, from the databases of local health care units, and from patient questionnaires. Setting. The target population consisted of all drug-treated diabetic patients from the two middle-sized communities in southern Finland, altogether 1776 patients. The study was retrospective. Subjects. A total of 1469 patients (82.7% of the target population) gave informed consent for the use of their medical records and 1325 patients (74.6% of the target population) returned the detailed 36-item questionnaire. Results. Of type 1 and type 2 insulin-treated diabetic patients, 14.6% and 1.0%, respectively, needed ambulance or emergency room care (incidence of 30.5 and 3.0 per 100 patient years). However, 31.0% of type 1 and 12.3% of type 2 diabetic patients reported at least one episode of SH (incidence of 72.0 and 27.0 per 100 patient years). Of all insulin-treated patients, 53 (7.8%) reported three or more episodes of SH. Signifi cant independent risk factors for SH were depression, daily exercise, and nephropathy but not glycaemic control. Conclusion. The incidence of SH was high in both types of insulin-treated diabetic patients. However, the recurrent episodes of SH were clustered in a small minority of insulin-treated patients with diabetes. The risk of SH should be considered when assessing the treatment target for an individual diabetic patient.