Background: To evaluate the pre-operative factors affecting clinical response to prostate surgery in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and methods: In this prospective cohort study, 172 patients who underwent surgical intervention for BPH (either as open prostatectomy ( n = 78) or monopolar-trans-urethral resection of prostate ( n = 94) from February 2017 to October 2019 were consecutively enrolled. Pre-operative conventional three-lumen urodynamic study and transabdominal sonography were performed for all patients to determine peak flow rate (Qmax), detrusor pressure at the peak flow rate (PdetQmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), presence of detrusor overactivity (DO), prostate volume and median lobe size, and bladder wall thickness with empty and full bladder. Uroflowmetry and cystoscopy were performed during follow-up, whenever indicated. Successful surgical outcome was defined as subjective satisfaction of the patient and a Qmax of more than 15 ml/s on post-operative uroflowmetry. Results: At 1-year follow-up, complete resolution of lower urinary tract syndrome (LUTS) was detected in 138 (80.2%) patients; however, 21 (12.2%) still had pure obstructive LUTS, 9 (5.2%) had pure storage LUTS, and 4 (2.3%) were still suffering from both storage and obstructive LUTS. After performing multivariable analysis, shorter duration of pre-operative medical treatment and higher pre-operative bladder contractility index (BCI) were found to be independent predictors of successful surgery ( p = 0.012 and p < 0.001, respectively). Results of the ROC curve analysis showed that a preoperative BCI level more than 90.95 and pre-surgical medical treatment duration less than 14.45 months have the most specificity and sensitivity to predict the success of surgical outcome. We also observed that the probability of recovery decreased considerably over time following surgery. Conclusion: Shorter duration of pre-operative medical treatment and increased pre-operative BCI can independently predict favorable outcome of BPH surgery. These factors could be used for better patient management and appropriate planning and consultation before BPH surgery.
Background: Delayed bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), which may occur within the first 3 weeks postoperatively, is a life-threatening complication that may result from arteriovenous fistula and arterial pseudoaneurysm. Angioembolization is the standard treatment when these patients develop hemodynamic instability despite conservative measures. Contrast hypersensitivity and renal insufficiency, however, contraindicate angiogram and subsequent embolization; in these patients, alternative methods such as the one described in this study may help in resolving the renal hemorrhage. Case Presentation: In this case series, we report the effective management of post-PCNL hemorrhage with nephroscopy and nephrostomy and drainage and tamponade because angioembolization was not feasible. Conclusion: Delayed bleeding after PCNL may be managed conservatively with nephrostomy drainage and tamponade when angioembolization is not feasible.
Adjustment of immunosuppressive and COVID-19 treatment in terms of drug interactions is still challenging. Herein, we report a 45-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease due to autosomal dominant polycystic diseases (ADPKD) with COVID-19 and pulmonary involvement following kidney transplantation. The patient was properly treated by discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs, bronchoscopy, and high volume of blood transfusions. The fact that we quickly used early intubation and a new treatment regimen that suppressed immune systems may help physicians develop optimal treatment strategies for similar severe cases. However, this treatment method requires more detailed evaluations due to the contradictory results in reviewing other studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.