No abstract

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, debilitating, chronic disorder caused by the production of pathogenic immunoglobulin G autoantibodies against the neuromuscular junction. A lack of real-world studies in rare diseases reflects a relatively limited understanding of the significant unmet needs and burden of disease for patients. We aimed to provide comprehensive real-world insights into the management and burden of MG from treating physicians in the United States (US). Methods: Data were collected using the Adelphi Real World MG Disease Specific Programme TM , a point-in-time survey of physicians and their patients with MG, in the US between March and July 2020. Physician-reported clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, disease history, treatments, and healthcare resource utilization, were collected. Results: In total, 456 patient record forms were completed by 78 physicians based in the US. At time of survey completion, patient mean age was 54.5 years. Mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 9.0 months (n = 357). Ocular symptoms were reported in 71.7% of patients. General fatigue affected 47.1% of patients and over half of those reported the severity as moderate or severe (59.5%, n = 128). Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and/or steroids were the most frequently prescribed first-line treatment type among patients receiving treatment at time of survey completion and with moderate-to-severe symptoms (77.9%, n = 159/204). High-dose steroids (n = 14) and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 13) were the most prescribed acute treatments among those receiving an acute treatment at time of survey completion (n = 36), with symptom exacerbations or myasthenic crises being the most common reasons for acute treatment. On average, 2.5 healthcare professionals were involved in patient management and 5.0 consultations were made per patient over the last 12 months. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that, despite treatment, there is a proportion of patients with MG in the US who had a significant need for improved disease management.

Introduction/Aims: Limited knowledge exists on treatment patterns in clinical practice in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). In this study we examined MG treatment patterns in the United States. Methods: Adult patients newly diagnosed with MG were identified from the IBM MarketScan insurance claims database. Patients with ≥2 MG International Classification of Disease diagnosis codes ≥3 months apart were retrospectively followed from the date of their first MG diagnosis record or start of treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI), intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) immunoglobulin (Ig), or plasma exchange (PLEx) therapy. Based on treatment received at any time during the follow-up period, patients were segmented into six main treatment cohorts. Exacerbations and use of IVIg, SCIg, or PLEx after the index date were identified.Results: During 2010 to 2019, 7,194 patients were followed for up to 10 (median, 2.3) years. Of 6,539 treated patients, 6,462 (99%) were ever treated with AChEI and/or corticosteroids (CS); 95% were first treated with AChEI and/or CS only; 33% received ≥1 nonsteroid immunosuppressive treatment (IST) and 2% received a biologic. During treatment with first IST (n = 2,166), patients experienced 42% and 94% higher incidence rates of exacerbations and IVIg, respectively, compared with AChEI and/or CS (n = 6,242), and 33% and 23% higher, respectively, compared with a second IST (n = 353).

Background Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, chronic, debilitating, unpredictable, and potentially life-threatening neuromuscular disease. There is a lack of real-world data on disease management that could be used to further understand and address unmet patient needs and burden. We aimed to provide comprehensive real-world insights in the management of MG in five European countries. Methods Data were collected using the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme™ in MG, a point-in-time survey of physicians and their patients with MG in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK). Physician- and patient-reported clinical data were collected, including demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, disease history, treatments, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and quality of life outcomes. Results In total, 144 physicians completed 778 patient record forms from March to July 2020 in the UK, and from June to September 2020 in France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Mean patient age at symptom onset was 47.7 years, with a mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis of 332.4 days (10.97 months). At diagnosis, 65.3% of patients were classified as Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Class II or above. Mean number of symptoms reported at diagnosis per patient was five, with ocular myasthenia reported in at least 50% of patients. At time of survey completion, the mean number of symptoms reported per patient was five and ocular myasthenia and ptosis were each still present in more than 50% of patients. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed chronic treatments in all countries. Of 657 patients treated with chronic treatment at the time of the survey, 62% continued to experience moderate-to-severe symptoms. On average, 3.1 healthcare professionals (HCPs) were involved in patient management, 6.2 consultations were made per patient with any HCP over the last 12 months, and 178 (22.9%) patients were hospitalized in the last 12 months. Overall, HCRU and disease management were similar across all countries. Conclusions Our findings demonstrated the high burden of MG despite current treatment options for patients with MG.

Background: There are limited data on the impact of myasthenia gravis (MG) on real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) and patient burden in the United States. Objectives: This study aims to assess HCRU in patients with MG using data from a US health claims database. Design: A retrospective, database study of adult patients newly diagnosed with MG, using the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare supplemental health insurance claims database. Methods: Patients with ⩾2 MG International Classification of Disease diagnosis codes ⩾3 months apart were followed from the date of their first MG diagnosis record or start of treatment. HCRU and use of immunoglobulins and plasma exchange during follow-up was assessed, as well as comorbidities, hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and specialist visits per year after diagnosis, and compared with age- and sex-matched non-MG controls. Results: During 2010–2019, 7194 patients were followed for up to 10 years (median = 2.3 years). During follow-up, patients with MG were 2.6-fold more likely than controls to be hospitalized, and 4.5-fold more likely to be admitted to an ICU. Risk and numbers of ER admission, hospitalization, and ICU visits were the highest in the 12 months post-diagnosis of MG and were consistently higher than controls during follow-up. MG was the main cause for most hospitalizations. Conclusion: Patients with MG have higher HCRU, compared with the age- and sex-matched non-MG controls. The early years after MG diagnosis are a period of particularly high healthcare burden, with many patients requiring hospitalization and ICU care to manage serious exacerbations.