The purpose of this article is improving leadership technology in the context of society informatization. Theoretical and methodological basis of the study includes an abstract-logical method, methods of induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, and systematization, used to substantiate the socio-economic aspects of leadership, as well as graphics methods to study the leadership development level and trends in the context of society informatization. Studies indicate that there are significant differences in the satisfaction level between staff members and managing business leaders holding executive position, i.e. in cases, where the roles of business leader and executive were performed by a single person, as well as staff members with subordinating business leaders, i.e. in cases, where the roles of business leader and executive were performed by different persons. While for staff member teams with business leaders holding executive positions, the average satisfaction score is 3.929, i.e. is very close to satisfactory, for teams with subordinating business leaders, the average satisfaction score is equal to 2.807, i.e. remains within the nonsatisfactory gradation. Additional facts in favor of the proposed hypothesis consist in a fact that in the teams, where executives lead in the business sector not only on the aspects of business leadership in general, having the highest total score, but also for each of aspects individually, the satisfaction indicators are the highest in the sample, equal to four or more points. At the same time, the least satisfaction was noted in the teams, where executives had a relatively low business status. The study has revealed that leadership in the future can be a stimulus for communication, activity, and formation of certain interpersonal relations in the context of society informatization

The aim of the article is to improve technology in the context of globalization. Analysis of the approaches used in the theory and practice of comparative state studies has shown that it is most advisable to develop a technology that includes a comparison (analogy) method, as well as normative, and design methods. It is established that the emergence of federal states is associated only with the industrial era. At that, in the context of the industrial revolution, in the public consciousness, the federal states were predominantly of experimental nature. It is revealed that greater confidence in this form of government in both public and public figures arose only with the beginning of industrialization, which caused the demand for complex management decisions. It is mentioned that federalization processes develop wavelike. This aspect engendered the phenomenon of post-colonial federalism. It is noted that the new states had to overcome ethnic and religious contradictions and heritage. It is proved that the era of post-modernization, which started after structural and cyclical crises, creates new challenges, which can be solved by federalist technologies, among other tools. At the same time, the start for federalization is caused by the emerging interest in it on the part of various social groups, which must be supported ideologically at the level of professional and mass consciousness.