Introduction: Aesthetic surgery procedures are generally done in a relatively healthy population and carry a rather low risk compared to other surgical specialties. The incidence of complications in aesthetic surgery varies greatly depending on the type, wound cleanliness regarding the anatomical site, complexity of the surgery, patient’s age, and comorbidities but is generally considered low. The overall incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in all aesthetic surgical procedures is around 1% in most of the literature while cases of necrotizing soft tissue infections are mostly found as individual reports. In contrast, treating COVID-19 patients is still challenging with many diverse outcomes. Surgical stress and general anesthesia are known mediators of cellular immunity impairment while studies regarding COVID-19 infection unquestionably have shown the deterioration of adaptive immunity by SARS-CoV-2. Adding COVID-19 to the modern surgical equation raises the question of immunocompetence in surgical patients. The main question of the modern post-lockdown world is: what could be expected in the postoperative period of perioperatively asymptomatic COVID-19 patients after aesthetic surgery? Case report: Here, we present a purulent, complicated, necrotizing skin and soft tissue infection (NSTI) after gluteal augmentation most likely triggered by SARS-CoV-2-induced immunosuppression followed by progressive COVID-19 pneumonia in an otherwise healthy, young patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of such adverse events in aesthetic surgery related to COVID-19. Conclusion: Aesthetic surgery in patients during the incubation period of COVID-19 or in asymptomatic patients could pose a significant risk for surgical complications, including severe systemic infections and implant loss as well as severe pulmonary and other COVID-19-associated complications.

Background and objectives: Bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common subepidermal autoimmune skin blistering disease (AIBD) has an estimated annual incidence of 2.4 to 42.8 new cases per million in different populations, designating it an orphan disease. Characterized by disruption of the skin barrier combined with therapy-induced immunosuppression, BP could pose a risk for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare necrotizing skin and soft tissue infection, with a prevalence of 0.40 cases per 100,000 to 15.5 cases per 100,000 population, often associated with immunosuppression. Low incidences of NF and BP classify them both as rare diseases, possibly contributing to the false inability of making a significant correlation between the two. Here, we present a systematic review of the existing literature related to the ways these two diseases correlate. Materials and methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature review was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases. The primary outcome was prevalence of NF in BP patients, while the secondary outcome was prevalence and mortality of SSTI in BP patients. Due to the scarcity of data, case reports were also included. Results: A total of 13 studies were included, six case reports of BP complicated by NF with six retrospective studies and one randomized multicenter trial of SSTIs in BP patients. Conclusions: Loss of skin integrity, immunosuppressive therapy, and comorbidities commonly related to BP patients are risk factors for necrotizing fasciitis. Evidence of their significant correlation is emerging, and further studies are deemed necessary for the development of BP-specific diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Introduction: Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD) are organ-specific skin blistering diseases clinically manifesting as bullae and vesicles of the skin and mucous membranes. The loss of skin barrier integrity renders patients susceptible to infection. Necrotizing fasciitis (NF), a rare yet severe infectious complication of AIBD has been insufficiently documented in the literature. Case report: We present a case of a 51-year-old male patient with NF initially misdiagnosed as herpes zoster. Given the local status, CT imaging, and laboratory parameters, NF diagnosis was made and the patient was taken for an urgent surgical debridement. In a further development, new bullae in remote areas erupted and a perilesional biopsy, direct immunofluorescence as well as local status, the patient's age, and atypical presentation, imposed an initial diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Differential diagnoses were bullous pemphigoid (BP) and bullous systemic lupus. In the literature, 9 other described cases were found and are reviewed. Conclusions: Due to its unspecific clinical picture, necrotizing fasciitis itself presents a frequently misdiagnosed soft tissue infection. Altered laboratory parameters in immunosuppressed patients often lead to misdiagnosing of NF and loss of precious time, which plays a major role in survival. Given the manifestation of AIBD as loss of skin integrity and immunosuppressive therapy, these patients could be more predisposed to NF than the general population.

Most skin tumors are not fatal, but if not treated in a timely manner, they can lead to significant morbidity. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in order to create more capacities for the treatment of COVID-19-positive patients as well as to contain the spread of the virus, the healthcare system was reorganized worldwide, leading to decreased access to preventive screening programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on healthcare accessibility to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients in Serbia. This retrospective study was conducted at the Clinic for Burns, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade. Patient demographics and pathohistological findings of tumors of patients living in and outside the capital in the period before, during, and after the pandemic were compared. The two groups did not show any differences regarding the largest tumor diameter prior and during the pandemic; however, this difference became extremely noticeable after the pandemic (15 mm vs. 27 mm; p < 0.001). While cSCCs are commonly slow-growing tumors, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is not negligible. This study found a population at a significant risk of cSCC metastasis, with additional evidence likely to emerge in the upcoming years.