Diagnosing and screening for tumors through noninvasive means represent an important paradigm shift in precision medicine. In contrast to tissue biopsy, detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor nucleic acids provides a minimally invasive method for predictive and prognostic marker detection. This allows early and serial assessment of metastatic disease, including follow-up during remission, characterization of treatment effects, and clonal evolution. Isolation and characterization of CTCs and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are likely to improve cancer diagnosis, treatment, and minimal residual disease monitoring. However, more trials are required to validate the clinical utility of precise molecular markers for a variety of tumor types. This review focuses on the clinical utility of CTCs and ctDNA testing in patients with solid tumors, including somatic and epigenetic alterations that can be detected. A comparison of methods used to isolate and detect CTCs and some of the intricacies of the characterization of the ctDNA are also provided.

Glioma, and in particular high-grade astrocytoma termed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is the most common primary tumor of the brain. Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT (O 6 -methylguanine-DNA Methyl transferase) DNA repair gene by promoter methylation compromises DNA repair and has been associated with longer survival in patients with GBM who receive alkylating agents. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter is determined by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction analysis (MSP). This protocol is often challenging with GBM specimens, because of extensive necrosis and scarcity of malignant cells. The objective of this study was to develop a reliable, clinically validated assay for detection of epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded brain tumor resections and methylation-specific PCR.

No abstract

The presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation is now part of clinical diagnostic algorithms, and JAK2 status is routinely assessed when BCR/ABL- chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are suspected. The aim of this study was to evaluate performance of 3 screening and 1 quantitative method for JAK2 V617F detection. For the study, 43 samples (27 bone marrow aspirates and 16 peripheral blood samples) were selected. The screening assays were the JAK2 Activating Mutation Assay (InVivoScribe, San Diego, CA), JAK2 MutaScreen kit (Ipsogen, Luminy Biotech, Marseille, France), and a home-brew melting curve analysis method. Ipsogen's JAK2 MutaQuant assay was used for quantification of mutant and wild-type alleles. The limit of detection was 1% for the kit-based screening methods and 10% for the melting curve method. The JAK2 MutaQuant assay demonstrated analytic sensitivity of 0.01%. All 4 methods detected cases of BCR/ABL- MPNs and gave negative results with BCR/ABL+ chronic myelogenous leukemia, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, and normal cases.

Recent advances in modern molecular technologies allow for the examination and measurement of cancer-related genomic changes. The number of molecular tests for evaluation of diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive markers is expected to increase. In recent years, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation has been firmly established as a biomarker in patients diagnosed with gliomas, for both clinical trials and routine clinical management. Similarly, molecular markers, such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for 1p/19q have already demonstrated clinical utility in treatment of oligodendroglial tumors, and others might soon show clinical utility. Furthermore, nonrandom associations are being discovered among MGMT, 1p/19q LOH, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, and other tumor-specific modifications that could possibly enhance our ability to predict outcome and response to therapy. While pathologists are facing new and more complicated requests for clinical genomic testing, clinicians are challenged with increasing numbers of molecular data coming from molecular pathology and genomic medicine. Both pathologists and oncologists need to understand the clinical utility of molecular tests and test results, including issues of turnaround time, and their impact on the application of targeted treatment regimens. This review summarizes the existing data that support the rationale for MGMT promoter methylation testing and possibly other molecular testing in clinically defined glioma subtypes. Various molecular testing platforms for evaluation of MGMT methylation status are also discussed.