The International Energy Agency (IEA) Task 41 is conducting an international survey concerning the integration of solar energy systems and architecture in order to identify barriers that architects are facing in incorporating active solar technologies in their design.The survey investigates the possible barriers of solar thermal and photovoltaics, to understand why there is still a resistance among architects for using these elements in their architectural design. Moreover, it asks about the needs of architects, on what should be developed for a wider use of solar active systems in the building skin.The survey also provides valuable information towards a comparative study of the two solar technologies from the perspective of architectural integration potentials. As the survey is conducted in 13 countries around the world (EU, Canada, South Korea), it gives a possibility to identify possible regional differences in understanding and acceptance of active solar technologies.

Rapid urbanization, the increasing effects of climate change, the need to reduce fossil fuels’ dependency as well as to improve cities’ resiliency are accelerating the shift towards renewable energy. Additionally, unnecessary complex roof morphologies that are often pushed by suburban divisions’ developers to make houses look more “opulent” and appealing to homebuyers, also impede the smooth integration of active solar technologies. To address this, and to respond to increasing homebuyers’ interest in renewable energy, this study looks to demonstrate how relatively minor design changes could affect the potential for solar generation and create ‘solar ready’ homes without compromising on the aesthetic of the roof morphologies in styles expected by homebuyers. It looked at six different roof morphological forms ranging from small to large houses, a common suburban house archetype in Canada. The roof configurations were remodelled to remove ‘fake dormers’, minimise ridges and valleys, etc. This process helped maximize the south, south-east, south-west, east and west facing surfaces. The results show that these changes could have a significant impact on the magnitude of solar power generation. The power output from a remodelled neighborhood at an optimized orientation exceeded the community’s electricity demand by 24%.

No abstract

The coal mine is located in the town of Labin, Istria peninsula, Croatia. Restoration of the tower is a part of the project that includes thorough restoration and re-use of the Labin mining complex for cultural, tourist and educational purposes. The tower was built in 1938 by Italian authorities as part of the pre-war campaign. It is a 32.5 m high steel structure that once enveloped the elevator to a 200 m deep mine shaft. The structure is a built up Vierendeel truss with four columns / chords connected with horizontal moment resistant beams. Two large steel inclined struts were resisting elevator rope forces connected to the elevator machine building. The mine was shut down in 1988. The assessment of the tower consisted of geometry measurement, cross-section shape determination, steel quality determination, condition of members and connections (rivets and bolts), protective coating condition and underground supports condition. Two samples were taken to laboratory to determine the steel grade with tensile yield test. Structural model with existing members has also been analysed. Different loads were considered comparing the original purpose of the tower and the planned representational purpose. In addition, structural member verification according to Eurocode standards has been done. Load bearing steel structure is geometrically sound, mostly with no visible deformations, deflections or drifts. Foundations are crack free and with no visible subsiding. Lack of maintenance of the anticorrosive coating from 1988 until today caused most of the damage. Due to the significantly aggressive environment, anchoring part of the structure was severely ruined. Lower part of the above ground structure was in the similar condition. Water retention and salt carried from the lower part of the shaft caused significant damage to the steel structure in these areas. Replaced members were built in with original riveting technique. Anchoring structure replacement called for a temporary support structure, which represented the most demanding operation in the whole restoration process. The temporary support structure was a steel truss structure in pyramidal form that allowed complete removal of the lowest segment and reconstruction of the anchoring elements and concrete foundation. According to the evaluation, existing galleries that surrounded the tower had to be completely removed and redesigned with new loads. Future use of the tower with its galleries is primarily of representational purpose. Moreover, a new elevator with its own structure inside the existing tower is considered and it has no influence on the existing