Pyrolysis bio-oils have great potential for the future use as biofuels and source of oxygenated chemicals. To optimize a pyrolysis process, detailed knowledge about the chemical composition of bio-oils is necessary. In recent years, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) has successfully been used to the characterization of pyrolysis bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass. This method enabled to detect thousands of semivolatile and nonvolatile, high-molecular-weight bio-oil compounds and provided partial information about their structure. In this work, we used high-resolution orbitrap mass spectrometry to characterize semivolatile and nonvolatile, high-molecular-weight compounds of four bio-oils obtained from the ablative flash pyrolysis of different biomass sources. Before the analyses of these bio-oils, we analyzed model bio-oil compounds and commercially available bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of wood using positive-ion and negative-ion electrospray (ESI) and positive-ion and negative-ion atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) orbitrap mass spectrometry and compared the results. Based on this comparison, a combination of negative-ion ESI and APCI was found to be well suited for the characterization of pyrolysis bio-oils; these techniques were thus used for the study of bio-oils from different biomass sources and the obtained results were compared. In the studied bio-oils, mostly compounds with 1–8 oxygen atoms per molecule were detected and their degree of unsaturation (DBE) was about 1–10 (negative-ion ESI) and 1–17 (negative-ion APCI), respectively. Among the studied bio-oils, the differences were observed mostly in abundances of their major compounds (compound classes). The analyses of model bio-oil compounds brought valuable information about their behavior during the HRMS characterization of bio-oils. The presented results could help to improve the understanding of bio-oil composition and HRMS characterization of bio-oils and facilitate their further utilization
Bio-oil
upgrading through its hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) using sulfided
catalysts has attracted significant attention because of its potential
to provide advanced biofuels. Although many studies have been undertaken,
a detailed understanding of the changes in the chemical composition
on the molecular level that would allow the better design of catalysts
for bio-oil upgrading is still insufficient. Therefore, we have subjected
straw bio-oil and products obtained from its hydrotreatment over a
broad range of experimental conditions to a detailed quantitative
chemical analysis. Most of the volatile compounds were quantified
by GC-MS. Among them, 115 compounds were quantified directly (i.e.,
using the appropriate standards) and more than 100 indirectly (i.e.,
based on their structural similarity with corresponding standards).
Moreover, the total concentrations of carboxylic acids, carbonyls
and phenols were quantified by the carboxylic acid number (CAN), Faix,
and Folin–Ciocalteu methods, respectively, to obtain complementary
and supporting information on the chemical composition to the GC-MS
data. The detailed quantification of most volatile compounds in the
feed and the products allowed us to create a reactivity order of the
oxygen-containing functional groups present and to understand the
origin of some of the compounds. On the basis of the results, the
upgrading of straw bio-oil from ablative fast pyrolysis at 340 °C
and 4 MPa seems to be optimal when evaluating the severity of the
reaction conditions and hydrogen consumption, on the one hand, and
the products quality, on the other hand. This provides a good starting
point for further catalyst development and optimization allowing the
long-term upgrading of the bio-oil for obtaining petroleum-refinery-compatible
feedstock.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.