This paper presents a case study of a neighbourhood low carbon energy system designed for five off-gas rural dwellings in the UK. The employment of the neighbourhood system aims to improve energy efficiency of the whole site, reduce dependency on heating oil or LPG for off-gas houses, maximize renewable energy usage on site, and minimize fuel poverty through affordable investments. System design is discussed and built on site survey, ongoing monitoring and validated modelling. Simulation is carried out in dynamic model HTB2. A ROI analysis is used to examine the long-term cost-effectiveness, taking into account any maintenance and replacement cost, degradation of system performance and discounting of money over time. The neighbourhood system scenario is compared with an alternative scenario of separate systems for individual houses, in terms of energy reduction, energy self-sufficiency, CO2 reduction and pay-back time. The simulation results indicate the designed optimal neighbourhood system can achieve similar self-sufficiency as that of a separate system scenario, with more than 70% of its electricity demand met by onsite electricity production. Both the neighbourhood system approach and the separate one can achieve carbon negative for the whole site, with the former contributing to 31% more carbon reduction than the latter. The neighbourhood system can be paid back within its lifespan, while the separate system approach can't. The payback time of the neighbourhood system can be reduced to 14 years if traditional bolt on PV system is used instead of building integrated PV. The outcome of the research demonstrated the affordability and replicability of the neighbourhood low carbon energy system, which can decrease fuel poverty, and meet government targets for CO2 reduction.

The current climate emergency concerns and the COVID-19 pandemic demand urgent action to maintain healthy indoor environments in energy efficient ways. Promoting good indoor environments, in particular, increasing ventilation levels, has been a prominent strategy to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 transmission indoors. However, this strategy could be detrimental to thermal comfort, particularly during the heating season in buildings located in temperate climate zones. This paper presents research conducted in two primary schools in South Wales (UK) where the temperature, relative humidity and the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration levels were monitored. The study monitored six classrooms and two communal spaces in the two schools during the academic year 2021/2022, the first academic year back to teaching and learning in school buildings after home-schooling and educational disruptions due to COVID-19 lockdowns. The study investigated the actions taken by teachers and pupils to balance the thermal comfort needs while minimising CO2 concentration levels. We conducted user studies to explore the comfort perceptions by pupils and teachers in relation to the thermal conditions and the freshness of air in the monitored classrooms. The paper identifies opportunities where end-users, teachers and pupils engaged with the management of the indoor environmental conditions and adopted actions to balance the requirement of reducing CO2 concentration levels while promoting thermal comfort. This research offers lessons and insights related to end-users’ agency and their understanding of indoor environments and thermal experience in schools.

This paper presents the design of a monitoring protocol to support retrofit strategies and drive the evaluation of a low carbon house. Monitoring is used during pre-intervention stage to facilitate the decision-making process, as well as in the post-intervention to evaluate the performance of the building and systems. The first phase refers to monitoring as a diagnostic tool with a view to reduce the uncertainty of suggested low carbon solutions by providing real measurements and evidence on building conditions, comfort, systems and occupants behaviour and interactions. The second phase utilises monitoring as an evaluation tool to quantify benefits and challenges of the retrofitting by providing information and analysis on the supply and demand reduction, the difference in comfort and the effectiveness of each intervention. The study explains the protocol development and discuss different monitoring depths and requirements based on the performance indicators required. A typical pre-1919 Welsh end-terraced dwelling is used as a case study to demonstrate the two phases of the proposed protocol. The protocol was developed as part of the Low Carbon Built Environment (LCBE) project at Cardiff University and it was tested in various building types and research-led retrofit packages.

European governments have set ambitious retrofitting targets driven by the commitment to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% by 2050. The United Kingdom has the oldest housing stock in Europe, with over 2/3 of dwellings built before 1976, when building regulations started to include energy efficiency. This raises concerns over carbon emissions, health, comfort and running costs, and government’s set targets and initiatives for significant improvements. Deep retrofitting by using innovative technologies with respect to aesthetics has considerable and measurable benefits, while it can be a costly and challenging process. This study examines a combination of measures undertaken in a pre-1919 dwelling in south Wales, including reduction of energy demand and the application of renewable energy supply and energy storage. A whole house performance and a systems breakdown evaluation is presented comparing the pre and post intervention status. Both monitoring and modelling tools where used, and the performance gap is also discussed. An annual reduction of 34% in space heating and 78% in electricity import was monitored with an additional electricity export of 3217kWh. This represents a total annual cost saving of £1115, at 2019 UK gas and electricity prices. The total cost of the retrofit was £55K.