Context Although off-label medications are frequently prescribed in palliative care, there are no published studies examining their use in the United States. Objectives We examined the frequency of off-label medication use in cancer patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU). Methods This prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients with advanced cancer admitted to the APCU of a tertiary care cancer center. We collected data on all prescription events, including indications for use, from admission to discharge. Off-label use was checked against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved indications. Results Among the 201 patients, median survival was 10 days (95% confidence interval 7-13), and 85 (42%) patients died in the APCU. We documented 6276 prescription events, and 2199 (35%) were off-label. Among off-label prescriptions, central nervous system agents (n=1606, 73%), hormones and synthetic substitutes (n= 302, 14%), and autonomic drugs (n=183, 8%) were most commonly prescribed. Haloperidol (n=720, 33%), chlorpromazine (n=292, 13%), dexamethasone (n=280, 13%), glycopyrrolate (n=175, 8%), hydromorphone (n=161, 7%), and morphine (n=156, 7%) were most frequently prescribed off-label. The most common indications for off-label prescribing were delirium (n=783, 36%) and dyspnea (n=449, 20%). 70% of all off-label prescription events had strong evidence supporting use, and 19% of prescription events had moderate or weak evidence for use. Conclusion One-third of prescription events in the APCU were off-label, with majority of off-label use having a strong level of supporting evidence. Our findings highlight the need for more research in key areas such as delirium and dyspnea management.

10027 Background: Despite risk for polypharmacy, elderly cancer patients may receive drugs whose time to benefit likely exceeds life expectancy. This study aims to describe use of drugs considered potentially unnecessary, namely anti-hyperlipidemics and anti-dementia drugs, and to identify factors associated with their use in Stage 3 or 4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients approaching end of life. Methods: We identified all patients older than 65 diagnosed with primary Stage 3 or 4 NSCLC between 2006 and 2011 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Information on drug prescriptions was extracted from Medicare Part D files. First-time hospice enrollment or death date was used as the final endpoint in analysis. The primary outcome was use of drugs of interest at 4 months before NSCLC diagnosis, 6 months and 3 months before death or hospice. Associations with demographic or other factors were tested using the Pearson χ2 test. Results: Of all 7983 patients, 45.1% were taking statins before diagnosis, while 40.7% and 30.9% were still taking statins at 6 and 3 months before death or hospice. Use of bile acid sequestrants, fibric acid derivatives, and cholesterol absorption inhibitors were found to decrease toward death or hospice. In contrast, anti-dementia drug use did not decrease, with 3.4% before diagnosis and 4.2% and 3.5% at 6 and 3 months before death or hospice. Approximately 30% of anti-dementia medications were newly prescribed at 6 and 3 months before study endpoint. Having a higher number of prescriptions at 3 months before death or hospice was associated with higher rates of drug use both before and after cancer diagnosis. Having a higher Charlson comorbidity index correlated with greater anti-dementia drug use before diagnosis. Demographic, socioeconomic, and treatment factors were not found to be correlated with drug use. Conclusions: A high prevalence of statin use persists while a notable proportion of anti-dementia drugs are newly prescribed toward death or hospice. Our findings suggest an opportunity for clinicians to re-evaluate risks and benefits of potentially unnecessary medications in elderly patients nearing end of life.