This study aimed to clarify the information required by hospital nurses (HN), homevisiting nurses (HVN), and long-term care insurance facility nurses (LFN) for continuous home care support for community-dwelling older patients with heart failure (HF).Semi-structured interviews with HN, HVN, and LFN involved in HF nursing were used to collect empirical data during August 2019-March 2020. The interview data were organized as narratives about the information necessary for continuing home-care support for older patients with HF, and categories were generated by content analysis.

The purpose of this study was to develop a self-evaluation scale to assess nursing faculty' thoughts in instructional design. Method: A questionnaire survey was conducted with 583 nursing faculty of 52 nursing education institutions. Based on previous studies, 47 items were prepared for the draft of the scale, and the validity of the contents was examined. Results of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis confirmed the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: The questionnaire was collected from 286/583 responses (response rate: 49.1%) and there were 262 effective responses (effective response rate: 44.9%). As a result of exploratory factor analysis, 31 items and 5 factor structures were identified. These were "teaching strategy," "students' readiness," "view of education," "teachers' expectations from students," and "nursing faculty's experience." The Cronbach's α of each five factor ranged from .806 to .905 and Goodness of fit of five factor model were GFI = .812, AGFI = .780, CFI = .892, and RMSEA = .064. Conclusion: Reliability and validity of Self-evaluation Scale to Assess Nursing Faculty's Thoughts found to be almost secured. 要 旨 目的：本研究目的は，授業設計における看護教員の思考を自己評価する尺度を開発することである． 方法：全国の看護基礎教育機関 52 校の看護教員を対象に質問紙調査を実施した．尺度の原案は先行研 究に基づき作成し，内容妥当性を検討した．分析は，項目分析，探索的因子分析を行い，信頼性および 構成概念妥当性の確認を行った． 結果：調査用紙の回収数は，286 部/583 部(回収率 49.1%) ，有効回答数は 262 部(有効回答率 44.9%)