Tranexamic acid (an antifibrinolytic agent) is of proven benefit in the treatment of bleeding in patients with congenital and acquired coagulation disorders. We report the case of a patient with an acquired Factor VIII inhibitor, who was on a prophylactic dose of tranexamic acid because of recurrent bleeding episodes and developed a pulmonary embolism. Although studies using tranexamic acid have not shown a definite increased risk for the development of venous thrombosis, this is the likely cause of the pulmonary embolism in this patient.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-induced post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD)occurs frequently when rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is used in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) conditioning. We retrospectively studied 554 patients undergoing ATG-conditioned myeloablative HCT. Strategies used to minimize mortality due to PTLD were either therapy of biopsy-diagnosed PTLD in the absence of EBV DNAemia monitoring (n = 266) or prompt therapy of presumed PTLD (based on clinical/radiologic signs and high EBV DNAemia, in the setting of weekly EBV DNAemia monitoring) (n = 199). Both strategies resulted in similar mortality due to PTLD (0.7% vs 1% at 2 years, P = .43) and similar overall survival (63% vs 67% at 2 years, P = .23) even though there was a trend toward higher PTLD incidence with the prompt therapy.Donor positive with recipient negative EBV (D+R−) serostatus was a risk factor for developing PTLD. Older patient age, HLA-mismatched donor, and graft-versus-host disease were not associated with increased risk of PTLD. In summary, in ATGconditioned HCT, D+R− serostatus, but not older age, mismatched donor or GVHD is a risk factor for developing PTLD. EBV DNAemia monitoring may be a weak risk factor for developing/diagnosing PTLD; the monitoring coupled with prompt therapy does not improve survival. K E Y W O R D SEpstein-Barr virus, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, prompt therapy, rituximab

Background Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who fail or are intolerant to JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have limited treatment options. Tagraxofusp is a targeted therapy directed to CD123 that was approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). CD123 is expressed on a variety of malignancies including BPDCN, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and certain myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including MF. High-expressing CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), the cell of origin of BPDCN, have been detected in the microenvironment of certain myeloid neoplasms, including MF, where they may play a tumor-promoting role. Notably, pDCs share a common precursor cell with monocytes, and monocytosis has been reported as a poor prognostic factor in patients with MF, associated with shortened overall survival. We hypothesized that tagraxofusp may offer a novel and rational therapeutic approach in patients with relapsed/refractory MF, and in particular in patients with monocytosis. Aims To assess safety and evaluate efficacy of tagraxofusp in patients with MF who were relapsed, refractory, or unable to tolerate JAKi. Methods This multicenter, open-label Phase 1/2 trial is enrolling patients with MF. In the Stage 1 (dose escalation), tagraxofusp was administered as a daily IV infusion at 7, 9, or 12 mcg/kg on days 1-3 every 21 days (cycle 1-4), 28 days (cycles 5-7), and 42 days (cycles 8+). In Stage 2 (expansion), patients are receiving the recommended Phase 2 dose (12 mcg/kg). Results 27 patients with MF have been treated, including 14 patients who had previously received ≥ 3 lines of therapy. Median age was 69 years (range 54-81), 52% were female, and 26% had baseline monocytosis (≥ 1x109/L). Baseline risk assessment based on the DIPSS Plus risk group assessment showed 1 patient (4%) with intermediate-1, 16 patients (59%) with intermediate-2, and 9 patients (33%) with high-risk. At study entry, median platelet count was 59 K/uL; 67% of patients had baseline platelets <100 K/uL, of which 10 patients had platelets <50 K/uL. 74% of patients had baseline splenomegaly (spleen palpable ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin). In terms of molecular mutations: JAK2 (n=18); CALR (n=3); and MPL (n=1), and additional molecular analysis showed ASXL1 (n=5). In terms of cytogenetics, 30% (8/27) of patients had an abnormal karyotype, mainly 20q- (n=3), -5/5q-, -7/7q-, and 12p- (each n=2). Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, incidence ≥ 15%) include headache, hypoalbuminemia, increased levels of alanine aminotransferase, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Most common ≥ grade 3 TRAE's were thrombocytopenia (8%) and anemia (15%). Capillary leak syndrome was reported in 1 patient (grade 3). Among the 17 evaluable patients with baseline splenomegaly, 53% had spleen size reductions, of which 4 patients had reductions of > 45%. In 5 patients with baseline splenomegaly and monocytosis (>1x109/L monocytes), 80% (4/5) had spleen size reductions, of which 2 had reductions of >45%. Five patients had treatment duration of 12 months or more, with two of those patients ongoing (13+,and 24+ months, respectively). Six patients with platelets <100 K/uL had treatment duration of 6 months or more, including 3 patients with baseline monocytosis who had treatment duration of 12 months or more. 7 patients had objective responses (IWG-MRT 2013 responses), including Clinical improvement (CI) (n=5) and CI (Symptom) (n=2). 20 patients were evaluable for symptomatic assessment (MPN-SAF TSS). Symptom response rate was 45% (defined as ³50% reduction in TSS score). Reductions in both symptom score and spleen size was noted in 6/6 patients who had splenomegaly at baseline. Conclusions Tagraxofusp demonstrated single agent clinical activity, with a predictable and manageable safety profile, in patients with relapsed/refractory MF, including in patients with monocytosis, a poor prognostic factor and unmet medical need. Tagraxofusp may offer MF patients, and MF patients with monocytosis in particular, a novel treatment option. Enrollment continues, and updated trial data will be presented. This clinical trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02268253. Disclosures Pemmaraju: affymetrix: Research Funding; sagerstrong: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; samus: Research Funding; mustangbio: Consultancy, Research Funding; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gupta:Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Yacoub:Dynavax: Equity Ownership; Cara: Equity Ownership; Ardelyx: Equity Ownership; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Speakers Bureau; Hylapharm: Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Other: Advisory role; Amgen: Other: Advisory role; Daiichi: Other: Advisory role; Stemline: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; celyad: Other: Advisory role; Abbvie: Other: Advisory role; Kite: Other: Advisory role; Jazz: Other: Advisory role; Astellas: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau. Lee:AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ai Therapeutics: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Roche Molecular Systems: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy. Schiller:Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sardone:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wysowskyj:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Poradosu:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. McDonald:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rupprecht:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Talpaz:Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Taparia:Novartis: Consultancy. Verstovsek:Protaganist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Pharma Essentia: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy. Khoury:Kiromic: Research Funding; Angle: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Patnaik:Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

No abstract

Timely diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is critical and relies on clinical judgment. The HLH‐2004 criteria are commonly used diagnostic criteria, whereas HScore was recently developed for reactive HLH. Objective In this external validation study, we sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the HLH‐2004 criteria and HScore and identify optimal cutoffs stratified by underlying etiology. Methods In this retrospective cohort of all hospitalized adults in Alberta, Canada, (1999–2019) who had ferritin >500 ng/ml and underwent either biopsies or soluble CD25 testing, we calculated the diagnostic accuracy of HLH‐2004 and HScore for the overall population and different etiologies. Results Of 916 patients, 98 (11%) had HLH. HLH‐2004 criteria ≥5 predicted HLH with a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive value of 90%, and negative predictive value of 94% (c‐statistic 92%). HScore ≥169 predicted HLH with better sensitivity (96%) but reduced specificity (71%), whereas the optimal cutoff ≥200 performed comparably to HLH‐2004. HLH‐2004 criteria outperformed HScore in most etiologies, whereas HScore improved sensitivity in inflammatory/autoimmune‐HLH. The optimal cutoff of HScore was higher in hematopoietic cell transplant due to higher prevalence of fevers and cytopenias. Conclusion HLH‐2004 criteria and HScore demonstrated excellent discriminatory power in identifying HLH. HScore may improve diagnostic accuracy in autoimmune‐HLH.