Background and Aim Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) defined as reflux of gastric content reaching above the upper esophageal sphincter is frequently found in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to investigate clinical and psychological differences between GERD patients with or without LPR symptoms. Methods This study enrolled 303 consecutive patients with proton pump inhibitor treatment‐naïve scheduled for upper endoscopy because of troublesome reflux symptoms and recognized as GERD by non‐dyspepsia reflux disease questionnaire score. Included GERD patients were further categorized into two study groups: with or without LPR by reflux symptoms index score. All participants were also evaluated with questionnaires for depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. Results There were 132 (43.6%) GERD patients with LPR symptoms and 171 (56.4%) GERD patients without LPR symptoms. GERD patients with LPR symptoms had more depression (P < 0.001), sleep disturbance (P = 0.002), irritable bowel syndrome (P = 0.008), functional dyspepsia (P = 0.005), and reflux symptoms burden (P < 0.001) than those without LPR symptoms. Erosive esophagitis was more in patients without LPR symptoms (P = 0.03). GERD patients with LPR symptoms (28.8%) had more complex psychological distress than those without LPR symptoms (28.8% vs 14%, P < 0.001). Reflux symptoms burden, sleep disturbance, and erosive esophagitis were independently associated with GERD overlapping with LPR symptoms. Conclusions Gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with LPR symptoms appear to have more reflux symptoms, psychological distress, and functional gastrointestinal disturbance but less erosive esophagitis. This work suggests that therapeutic strategy with tailored multidimensional approach is promising for GERD patients overlapping with LPR symptoms.

Background/Aims: We aimed to investigate gastrointestinal symptoms, clinical characteristics, and psychological factors in subjects with and without sleep disturbance (SD) in a health screening cohort. Methods: We enrolled 2,752 consecutive subjects during their health checkups. All participants underwent an evaluation with questionnaires. Demographic characteristics and biochemical data were recorded. SD was confirmed when Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score was greater than 5. Results: Among the study population (n = 2,674), 956 (36%) individuals had SD. SD was associated with female gender, older age, lower level of education, higher systolic blood pressure, higher serum high-density lipoprotein levels and higher prevalence of functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). SD subjects also had more depression, more anxiety, more severe gastrointestinal reflux disease symptoms and higher prevalence of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD; p < 0.001). SD was ­independently associated with female gender (OR 1.75, p < 0.001), older age (OR 1.03, p < 0.001), NERD (OR 1.88, p = 0.004), IBS (OR 1.51, p = 0.043), and depression (OR 1.16, p < 0.001) by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Future studies will be needed to clarify the interrelationships among SD, psychological stress, and functional gastrointestinal disorders.

No abstract

No abstract

Background/aimSildenafil induces smooth muscle relaxation of the esophagus by blocking type 5 phosphodiesterase that degrades cyclic guanine monophosphate. We aimed to characterize the effects of sildenafil on esophageal peristalsis and contraction reserve using high‐resolution manometry (HRM).MethodsFifteen healthy adults (12 men, age 21‐39, mean 27 years) participated in this study using HRM following either sildenafil 50 mg or placebo. HRM with ten wet swallows and five multiple rapid swallows was performed in all participants. HRM metrics included esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ‐CI), basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, 4‐second integrated relaxation pressure (IRP‐4s), distal contractile integral (DCI), distal latency, resting upper esophageal sphincter pressure (UESP), and the response to MRS.ResultsSildenafil significantly lowered EGJ‐CI (P < .001), LES pressure (P = .04), IRP‐4s (P = .02), and DCI (P < .001). There was no difference in UESP (P = .87) between sildenafil and placebo. Sildenafil significantly decreased peristaltic vigor, inducing absent peristalsis in 12 subjects and ineffective esophageal motility in 3 subjects. Peristaltic response and augmentation following MRS were significantly inhibited following sildenafil (7% vs 100%, P < .001, and none vs 73%, P < .001).ConclusionsSildenafil attenuates EGJ barrier function, resting LES pressure, and LES relaxation. Both esophageal body contractility and contraction reserve are inhibited by sildenafil in healthy adults.