ObjectiveCurrent knowledge on the global burden of infant sepsis is limited to population-level data. We aimed to summarize global case fatality rates (CFRs) of young infants with sepsis, stratified by gross national income (GNI) status and patient-level risk factors.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on CFRs among young infants < 90 days with sepsis. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2010 and September 2019. We obtained pooled CFRs estimates using the random effects model. We performed a univariate analysis at patient-level and a meta-regression to study the associations of gestational age, birth weight, onset of sepsis, GNI, age group and culture-proven sepsis with CFRs.ResultsThe search yielded 6314 publications, of which 240 studies (N = 437,796 patients) from 77 countries were included. Of 240 studies, 99 were conducted in high-income countries, 44 in upper-middle-income countries, 82 in lower-middle-income countries, 6 in low-income countries and 9 in multiple income-level countries. Overall pooled CFR was 18% (95% CI, 17–19%). The CFR was highest for low-income countries [25% (95% CI, 7–43%)], followed by lower-middle [25% (95% CI, 7–43%)], upper-middle [21% (95% CI, 18–24%)] and lowest for high-income countries [12% (95% CI, 11–13%)]. Factors associated with high CFRs included prematurity, low birth weight, age less than 28 days, early onset sepsis, hospital acquired infections and sepsis in middle- and low-income countries. Study setting in middle-income countries was an independent predictor of high CFRs. We found a widening disparity in CFRs between countries of different GNI over time.ConclusionYoung infant sepsis remains a major global health challenge. The widening disparity in young infant sepsis CFRs between GNI groups underscore the need to channel greater resources especially to the lower income regions.Systematic Review Registration[www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42020164321].

Introduction: With improving mortality rates in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS), functional outcomes in survivors are increasingly important. We aim to describe the change in functional status score (FSS) from baseline to discharge and to identify risk factors associated with poor functional outcomes.Methods: We examined clinical records of patients with PARDS admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from 2009 to 2016. Our primary outcome was acquired morbidity at PICU and hospital discharge (defined by an increase in FSS ≥3 points above baseline). We included severity of illness scores and severity of PARDS in our bivariate analysis for risk factors for acquired morbidity.Results: There were 181 patients with PARDS, of which 90 (49.7%) survived.Median pediatric index of mortality 2 score was 4.05 (1.22, 8.70) and 21 (23.3%) survivors had severe PARDS. A total of 59 (65.6%) and 14 (15.6%) patients had acquired morbidity at PICU and hospital discharge, respectively. Median baseline FSS was 6.00 (6.00, 6.25), which increased to 11.00 (8.75, 12.00) at PICU discharge before decreasing to 7.50 (6.00, 9.25) at hospital discharge. All patients had significantly higher FSS at both PICU and hospital discharge median compared to baseline. Feeding and respiratory were the most affected domains. After adjusting for severity of illness, severity categories of PARDS were not a risk factor for acquired morbidity.Conclusion: Acquired morbidity in respiratory and feeding domains was common in PARDS survivors. Specific attention should be given to these two domains of functional outcomes in these children.

IntroductionThe effect of neonatal sepsis on the developing brain is not well documented. We aim to perform evidence synthesis to determine the outcome of neurodevelopmental impairment and intellectual disability among survivors of neonatal sepsis. The data gathered will inform on the long-term neurocognitive outcomes of neonates with sepsis and the measures used to document their developmental disability.Methods and analysisWe will perform a search based on the following parameters: neonates and infants less than 90 days old diagnosed with sepsis who had neurocognitive outcomes or measures of developmental disability reported. We will search PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase and Web of Science for articles in English language published between January 2010 and December 2019. Clinical trials and observational studies will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for eligibility. Data extraction will then be performed using a standardised form. The quality of evidence and risk of bias will be assessed using Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Intervention (ROBINS-I). The results will be synthesised qualitatively and pooled for meta-analysis.Ethics and disseminationNo formal ethical approval is required as there is no collection of primary data. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be disseminated through conference meetings and peer-reviewed publications.PROSPERO registration numberRegistration submitted CRD42020164334

IntroductionNeonatal sepsis has a high mortality rate that varies across different populations. We aim to perform a contemporary global evidence synthesis to determine the case fatality rates of neonatal sepsis, in order to better delineate this public health urgency and inform strategies to reduce fatality in this high-risk population.Methods and analysisWe will search PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase and Web of Science for articles in English language published between January 2010 and December 2019. All clinical trials and observational studies involving infants less than 90 days old with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis and reported case fatality rate will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies and extract data on study variables chosen a priori. Quality of evidence and risk of bias will be assessed using Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and ROBINS-I. Results will be synthesised qualitatively and pooled for meta-analysis.Ethics and disseminationNo formal ethical approval is required as there is no collection of primary data. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be disseminated through conference meetings and peer-reviewed publications.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020164321.

No abstract