Abstract. Early diagnosis and management improve the outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The present study explored the application of high-frequency ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of early RA. Thirty-nine patients (20 males and 19 females) diagnosed with early RA were enrolled in the study. A total of 1,248 positions, including 858 hand joints and 390 tendons, were examined by high-frequency US and MRI to evaluate the presence of bone erosion, bone marrow edema (BME), synovial proliferation, joint effusion, tendinitis and tendon sheath edema. The imaging results of the above abnormalities, detected by US, were compared with those identified using MRI. No statistically significant overall changes were observed between high-frequency US and MRI in detecting bone erosion [44 (5.1%) vs. 35 (4.1%), respectively; P>0.05], tendinitis [18 (4.6%) vs. 14 (1.5%), respectively; P>0.05] and tendon sheath edema [37 (9.5%) vs. 30 (7.7%), respectively; P>0.05]. Significant differences were observed between high-frequency US and MRI with regards to the detection of synovial proliferation [132 (15.4%) vs. 66 (7.7%), respectively; P<0.05] and joint effusion [89 (10.4%) vs. 52 (6.1%), respectively; P<0.05]. In addition, significant differences were identified between the detection of BME using MRI compared with high-frequency US (5.5 vs. 0%, respectively; P<0.05). MRI and high-frequency US of the dominant hand and wrist joints were comparably sensitive to bone erosion, tendinitis and tendon sheath edema. However, MRI was more sensitive in detecting bone marrow edema in early RA, while US was more sensitive in the evaluation of joint effusion and synovial proliferation. In conclusion, US and MRI are promising for the detection and diagnosis of inflammatory activity in patients with RA.
Background SENP1 (sentrin/small ubiquitin‐like modifier‐specific protease 1) has emerged as a significant modulator involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of human diseases, especially cancer. However, the regulatory roles of SENP1 in cardiovascular biology and diseases remain controversial. Our current study aims to clarify the function and regulation of SENP1 in pressure overload‐induced cardiac remodeling and dysfunction. Methods and Results We used a preclinical mouse model of transverse aortic constriction coupled with in vitro studies in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes to study the role of SENP1 in cardiac hypertrophy. Gene delivery system was used to knockdown or overexpress SENP1 in vivo. Here, we observed that SENP1 expression was significantly augmented in murine hearts following transverse aortic constriction as well as neonatal rat cardiomyocytes treated with phenylephrine or angiotensin II. Cardiac‐specific SENP1 knockdown markedly exacerbated transverse aortic constriction‐induced cardiac hypertrophy, systolic dysfunction, fibrotic response, and cellular apoptosis. In contrast, adenovirus‐mediated SENP1 overexpression in murine myocardium significantly attenuated cardiac remodeling and dysfunction following chronic pressure overload. Mechanistically, JAK2 (Janus kinase 2) and STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) acted as new interacting partners of SENP1 in this process. SENP1‐JAK2/STAT3 interaction suppressed STAT3 nuclear translocation and activation, ultimately inhibiting the transcription of prohypertrophic genes and the initiation of hypertrophic response. Furthermore, cardiomyocyte‐specific STAT3 knockout mice were generated to validate the underlying mechanisms, and the results showed that STAT3 ablation blunted the cardiac hypertrophy‐promoting effects of SENP1 deficiency. Additionally, pharmacological inhibition of SENP1 by Momordin Ic amplified cardiac remodeling post‐transverse aortic constriction. Conclusions Our study provided evidence that SENP1 protected against pressure overload‐induced cardiac remodeling and dysfunction via inhibiting STAT3 signaling. SENP1 supplementation might constitute a new promising treatment against cardiac hypertrophy. Notably, cardiovascular side effects should be seriously considered while applying systemic SENP1 blockers to suppress tumors.
We studied the diagnostic value of high-frequency color Doppler ultrasonography (HCDU) examination in combination with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody testing in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with finger joint damage. From January 2015 to December 2015, 80 patients diagnosed with RA with finger joints damage were enrolled in this study. Patients were examined with HCDU. Serum anti-CCP antibody level was tested using ELISA, and results were compared with the healthy control group. Results obtained by ELISA demonstrated that the positive rate of anti-CCP antibodies was 73.8% in the study group, and 10% in the control group. The negative rate was 26.2% in the study group, and 90% in the control group. HCDU examination suggested that the predominantly affected joint by bone erosion of RA with finger joint damage was MCP3 (16.7%), followed by PIP3 (14.1%), MCP2 (13.5%) and PIP2 (12.8%). The slightest affected joint was thumb metacarpophalangeal joint, followed by thumb, little finger metacarpophalangeal joint and proximal interphalangeal joint. The sensitivity of diagnosis of RA with finger joints damage with both HCDU and CCP antibody examination showed a significantly lower level compared with examination with each one of the methods alone, while specificity showed a significantly higher level. Thus, a combination of HCDU examination and anti-CCP antibody testing can be considered useful to improve the early diagnostic rate of RA. HCDU examination is a sensitive, secure, atraumatic and easily-operated diagnostic method for early RA patients with finger joint damage. When combined with anti-CCP antibody testing, it will provide a better chance for RA patients, and give them hope for a better treatment and improved prognosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.