Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a generally columnar graft is considered the gold standard for treating anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, but such grafts cannot replicate the geometry and mechanical properties of the native anterior cruciate ligament.Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative hourglass-shaped graft versus a traditional columnar graft for restoring joint stability and graft force, while avoiding notch impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Methods: Finite element models of a human knee were developed to simulate ① An intact state, ② anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using columnar grafts with different diameters (7.5–12 mm in 0.5 mm increments), ③ anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using columnar grafts with different Young’s moduli (129.4, 168.0 and 362.2 MPa) and ④ anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hourglass-shaped grafts with different Young’s moduli. The knee model was flexed to 30° and loaded with an anterior tibial load of 103 N, internal tibial moment of 7.5 Nm, and valgus tibial moment of 6.9 Nm. The risk of notch impingement, knee stability and graft forces were compared among the different groups.Results: This study found that columnar grafts could not simultaneously restore knee stability in different degree of freedoms (DOFs) and graft force to a level similar to that of the intact knee. The anterior tibial translation and graft force were restored to a near-normal condition when the internal tibial rotation was over-restrained and valgus tibial rotation was lax. A graft diameter of at least 10 mm was needed to restore knee stability and graft force to physiological levels, but such large grafts were found to be at high risk of notch impingement. In contrast, the hourglass-shaped graft was able to simultaneously restore both knee stability and graft force at knee flexion of 30° while also having a much lower risk of impingement.Conclusion: Under knee flexion angle of 30°, an hourglass-shaped graft was better able to restore joint stability and graft force to a near-physiological level than columnar grafts, while also reducing the risk of notch impingement.

The size of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) often varies between individuals, but such variation is not typically considered during ACL reconstruction (ACLR). This study aimed to explore how the size of the ACL affects the selection of a suitable graft diameter. A finite element model of a human knee was implanted with intact ACLs of different dimensions (0.95, 1 and 1.05 times the size of the original ACL) and with grafts of different diameters, to simulate ACLR (diameter 7.5–12 mm in 0.5 mm increments). The knee models were flexed to 30° and loaded with an anterior tibial load of 103 N, internal tibial moment of 7.5 Nm, and valgus tibial moment of 6.9 Nm. Knee kinematics (anterior tibial translation (ATT), internal tibial rotation (ITR) and valgus tibial rotation (VTR)) and ligament forces were recorded and compared among the different groups. The results showed that, compared with the intact knee, a graft diameter of 7.5 mm was found to increase the ATT and VTR, but reduce the graft force. Increasing the graft diameter reduced knee laxity and increased the graft force. A 10% increase in the size of the ACL corresponded to a 3 mm larger graft diameter required to restore knee stability and graft force after ACLR. It was concluded that the graft diameter should be selected according to the dimensions of the native ACL, for better restoration of knee functionality. This study may help to improve the clinical treatment of ACL ruptures.

IntroductionPigs are widely used for clinical research on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) because of the similarity of the knee structure to the human knee. But evidence to support the suitability of using porcine samples to guide clinical practices is limited. This study aims to explore the qualitative and quantitative morphological features of the porcine knee and ACL, and to compare these with data on humans reported in literature.MethodsNineteen porcine knees were used for this study. The bone structures were measured on coronal X-ray images. The length of the ACL was measured using a caliper. The ACL bone insertion sites were marked and measured on a digital photograph. The lengths of the long and short axis of the ACL isthmus were measured on the X-ray microscopy reconstructed images. The outcomes were compared with previously reported data on humans using an abstract independent-samples T test.ResultsQualitative observation indicated a similar location, orientation and general morphology of the porcine ACL to human ACLs. The major difference was the location of the ACL tibial insertion with respect to the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM). The porcine ACL was split into AM and PL bundles by the AHLM, while the AHLM was adjacent to the anterolateral border of the ACL tibial insertion in human knees. The quantitative comparison showed no significant difference between the human and porcine ACL in terms of the length of the ACL, the width of the femoral condyle and tibial plateau, and the tibial interspinal width. However, the CSA, the lengths of the long and short axis of the ACL isthmus, and the femoral and tibial insertion areas of the porcine ACL were all significantly larger than the reported features in human knees.ConclusionThe location, orientation and basic morphology of the porcine ACL and knee are similar to humans. However, the two-bundle structure is more distinct in a porcine ACL, and the dimensions of the porcine ACL are generally larger. This study may provide useful information to researchers when assessing the feasibility and limitations of using porcine samples for research on the human ACL and knee.