In organic chemistry, spatial reasoning is critical for
reasoning about spatial relationships in three dimensions and representing
spatial information in diagrams. Despite its importance, little is
known about the underlying cognitive components of spatial reasoning
and the strategies that students employ to solve spatial problems
in organic chemistry. Although prior research suggests that individual
differences in visual–spatial ability (assumed to measure facility
in visual–spatial imagery) predict success on spatial problems
in organic chemistry and explain sex differences in organic chemistry
achievement, it is unclear whether students rely on visual–spatial
imagery while engaged in chemistry problem solving. In the present
study, we investigated which strategies students use to solve spatial
chemistry problems and the relationships between strategy choice,
spatial ability, and sex. To that end, we explored the use of alternative
problem-solving strategies, such as algorithms and heuristics, that
may obviate the impact of visual–spatial imagery on problem
solving. The results indicated that students employ multiple strategies
that include heuristics and the construction of external diagrams
rather than relying exclusively on imagistic reasoning. Importantly,
we observed students’ choice of strategy to be independent
of visual–spatial ability, and we observed that women employ
strategies differently than men after instruction in the domain.
Poor spatial ability can limit success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Many initiatives aim to increase STEM achievement and degree attainment through selective recruitment of high-spatial students or targeted training to improve spatial ability. The current study examines an altemative approach to increasing achievement that includes problem-solving strategy training. In this study, we examined how training in multiple problem-solving strategies affects science achievement and its relations to sex and spatial ability. We compared 3 interventions that trained either mental imagery strategies, analytic problem-solving strategies, or their combination in the context of a college chemistry course. As predicted, students adopted more analytic strategies after analytic training, and women used significantly more analytic strategies than men after instruction. Training in the combined use of mental imagery and analytic strategies eliminated sex differences in achievement, but training in a single type of strategy resulted in a male achievement advantage. Our work demonstrates that achievement is dependent not only on spatial ability but also on strategy choice, and that strategy training offers a viable route to improving the performance of female students.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.