Aims: Millions of lives are saved each year through blood transfusion but a safe blood supply is a critical component of health care to prevent the spread of blood-borne infectious diseases. Therefore, it is essential to assess the prevalence and identify the most common culprit and risk in transfusion services. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2015 to May 2015 at the Hawassa blood bank center. Blood donors who donated blood for transfusion purposes were considered for the study. Whole blood was collected and serum was separated from each donor. The sera were used for examination of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and syphilis. Thick film was prepared and stained using Giemsa for malaria detection. Results: A total of 384 blood donors were screened during the study period. Among these donors, 67.2% (258) were males and 32.8% (126) were females. The overall prevalence of transfusion transmitted infections (TTI) was 28 out of 384 (7.29%) apparently healthy donors. and malaria was 6 (1.6%), 16 (4.2%), 2 (0.5%), 3 (0.8%) and 1 (0.3%) respectively. Two out of 384 (0.5%) had co-infections with HIV-HBV 1 (0.26%) and HBV-HCV 1 (0.26%). A 1:14 ratio (7.14%) of the blood collected was discarded only due to the presence of TTI. The highest discard rate was recorded from HBV infected units 57.1%, followed by HIV 21.40%, syphilis 10.7%, HCV 7.10%, and malaria 3.60%. Overall, TTIs were found in males (7.8%), married (2.5%), rural (8%), private/NGO employed donors (28.6%), 45-54 age group (20%), and in replacement/family donors (16.1%) (p = 0.039). Conclusion: The prevalence of TTIs in the Hawassa blood bank center was significantly high. HBV infection was the major cause for TTIs. Recommendations: Overall, effective clinical and laboratory screening of blood donors is essential. Proper treatment of TTI positive cases and a good donor selection program will help to reduce the prevalence of TTIs in donor units. Blood bank programs should give much more consideration in screening and diagnosis of HBV which is the main TTI that causes a high discard rate of blood.
BackgroundHemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) is the predominant hemoglobin found in HbA1 fractions. A1c assay is the recommended assay for diagnosing diabetes and any condition that changes red cell turnover such as Iron deficiency Anemia (IDA), will lead to spurious A1C results. Therefore, the present study was aimed at determining the effect of IDA on HbA1c in diabetic patients attending Black Lion Specialized Teaching Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.MethodsA facility based comparative cross sectional study was conducted on 174 diabetic patients (87 with IDA and 87 without IDA) from April to July 2016. Socio demographic data and clinical conditions were collected using structured questionnaire. Venous blood was collected for performing Complete blood count (CBC) using Cell dyn 1800 hematology analyzer; Serum ferritin, performed by COBAS INTEGRA 400/800 Chemistry analyzer and HbA1c tests, performed by COBAS C 111 analyzer. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 21 software. Pearson’s correlation, chi-square, and independent t-tests were calculated. The data was presented as mean ± SD. A P-value of < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.ResultsMean hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (HCT), Mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were lower in IDA group compared to non-IDA diabetic patients. HbA1c (%) level was significantly lower in IDA group (6.18 ± 1.57) compared with the non-IDA diabetic patients (7.74 ± 1.81) (p < 0.05).ConclusionHbA1c is significantly lower in diabetic patients with IDA compared to the non-IDA diabetic patients. Therefore, the authors believe that monitoring these patients using only HbA1c could be misleading, hence physicians and health care providers should take this into account before making any therapeutic decision. Detailed examination including large number of participants employing advanced laboratory techniques is recommended.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12878-018-0132-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Background Anemia is a common finding in cancer, which is caused by many factors. It is a major cause of morbidity in cancer patients, worsens disease status and impairs treatment outcome; however, little is known about the prevalence of anemia and associated factors among cancer patients during diagnosis in developing countries like Ethiopia. In response to this, we have conducted research with the aim of assessing the prevalence of anemia and associated factors among newly diagnosed patients with solid malignancy at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), Radiotherapy center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2014. A total of 422 newly diagnosed patients with solid malignancy attending Radiotherapy center, TASH were enrolled to assess anemia prevalence and associated factors. Data were coded, entered and analyzed using SPSS version16. Using logistic regression, chi squares, Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were computed to measure strength of association between variables. p-value < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Result Out of 422 respondents, 285 (68%) were females and 153 (36%) of respondents fell into 35–49 age group with age range between 18 and 80 years and the median age of 45. Magnitude of solid cancers was gynecologic (28.9%), breast (22.7%), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (7.6%), colorectal (7.1%), sarcoma (6.9%), head and neck (4.5%), thyroid (3.3%), hepatoma (1.9%), and others (17.1%). The overall prevalence of anemia across different tumor was 23% and higher anemia prevalence was noted in gynecologic (37.7%) and colorectal carcinomas (26.7%). The majority of the anemic patients (68%) remained untreated for anemia. The mean trigger hemoglobin for transfusion was 7.7 g/dl. About 83.5% of anemia was mild to moderate type. Performance status (AOR = 3.344; 95% CI 1.410–7.927) and bleeding history (AOR = 3.628; 95% CI 1.800–7.314) showed statistically significant association with occurrence of anemia with p-value < 0.05. Conclusion Among solid cancers, gynecologic cancer remained the dominant one. Anemia prevalence was 23% in general, in which gynecologic and colorectal cancers were more prevalent. ECOG performance status and bleeding history showed a statistically significant association with the occurrence of anemia.
Objectives To determine the agreement of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA) at the National Blood Bank Service in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods The study was conducted from January to June 2016 on 190 syphilis ELISA positive and 190 negative samples stored at the National Blood Bank Service (NBBS) laboratory, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from July 2015 to December 2015. A systematic random sampling method was used to select samples. The data were analyzed by SPSS version 20 software. The overall percent agreement, kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the tests were calculated. Results From 190 positive sera, 151 (80%) were confirmed as positive by TPHA, and 39 (20%) were found false positive; 59 (31.1%) of them were positive and 131 (68.9%) were false positive by RPR. From 190 negative sera, all were negative by RPR and TPHA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of TPHA were 99.9%, 85%, 79%, and 100%, respectively, while RPR was 62%, 99%, 100%, and 63%, respectively. Overall percent agreement of ELISA with TPHA was 90% and corresponding kappa value was 0.795, and ELISA with RPR was 66% with a kappa value of 0.375. Conclusion TPHA was very sensitive; there was substantial agreement with ELISA. Whereas RPR was highly specific and less sensitive, there was fair agreement with ELISA. TPHA can be used interchangeably with ELISA to screen blood in blood bank laboratories.
Background Globally the incidence of cancer is about 19.3 million new cases per year. Chemotherapy is among the standard treatments for cancer but neutropenia and febrile neutropenia are the most common side effects. Objective To assess the incidences of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, febrile-neutropenia and associated factors in solid cancer patients attending Oncology unit of St. Paul Hospital Millennium Medical College in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods In this institution-based longitudinal study conducted from February to September, 2020 at one of the largest teaching and referral hospitals of Ethiopia, 101 patients who were diagnosed with any type of solid cancer were recruited using convenience sampling method. Patients were followed-up until they completed five cycles of chemotherapy. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23 software. Paired sample t -test was used to compare the pre- and post-treatment results. Chi-squared test was employed to determine associated factors of neutropenia, and p-values less than 0.05 were taken as statistically significant. Results Of the total 101 participants, 98 were eligible per inclusion criteria and 6 (6.1%) of them died during the study period. The age of the participants ranged from 16–84 years with a mean age of 45. Of them, 48 (49.0%) were in the age group of 16–44 years, 73 (74.5%) were female, 66 (67.3%) were married, and 42.9% attained primary education. Among 92 patients, the incidence of neutropenia was 65 (70.7%) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 46 (50.0%). Adriamycin + cyclophosphamide and Adriamycin + cyclophosphamide + paclitaxel were the most commonly used anti-cancer treatments in this study. None of the tested factors were associated with chemo-induced neutropenia. Conclusion More than two thirds of the patients had chemotherapy associated neutropenia while half of the patients had febrile neutropenia; close monitoring of such patients is warranted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.