The expression of two monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) was examined in muscle and heart. MCT1 and MCT4 proteins are coexpressed in rat skeletal muscles, but only MCT1 is expressed in rat hearts. Among six rat fast-twitch muscles (red and white gastrocnemius, plantaris, extensor digitorum longus, red and white tibialis anterior) there was an inverse relationship between MCT1 and MCT4 (r = -0.94). MCT1 protein was correlated with MCT1 mRNA (r = 0.94). There was no relationship between MCT4 mRNA and MCT4 protein. MCT1 (r = -0.97) and MCT4 (r = 0.88) protein contents were correlated with percent fast-twitch glycolytic fiber. When normalized for their mRNAs, MCT1 but not MCT4 was still correlated with the percent fast-twitch glycolytic fiber composition of rat muscles (r = -0.98). MCT1 and MCT4 were also measured in plasma membranes (PM), triads (TR), T tubules (TT), sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), and intracellular membranes (IM). There was an intracellular pool of MCT4 but not of MCT1. The MCT1 subcellular distribution was as follows: PM (100%) > TR (31.6%) > SR (15%) = TT (14%) > IM (1.7%). The MCT4 subcellular distribution was considerably different [PM (100%) > TR (66.5%) > TT (36%) = SR (43%) > IM (24%)]. These studies have shown that 1) the mechanisms regulating the expression of MCT1 (transcriptional and posttranscriptional) and MCT4 (posttranscriptional) are different and 2) differences in MCT1 and MCT4 expression among muscles, as well as in their subcellular locations, suggest that they may have different roles in muscle.

We examined the isoform-specific regulation of monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)1 and MCT4 expression by contractile activity in red and white tibialis anterior muscles. After 1 and 3 wk of chronic muscle stimulation (24 h/day), MCT1 protein expression was increased in the red muscles (+78%, P < 0.05). In the white muscles, MCT1 was increased after 1 wk (+191%) and then was decreased after 3 wk. In the red muscle, MCT1 mRNA accumulation was increased only after 3 wk (+21%; P < 0.05). In the white muscle, MCT1 mRNA was increased after 1 wk (+30%; P < 0.05) and 3 wk (+15%; P < 0.05). MCT4 protein was not altered in either the red or white muscles after 1 or 3 wk. MCT4 mRNA was transiently lowered (approximately 15%) in both muscles in the 1st wk, but MCT4 mRNA levels were back to control levels after 3 wk. In conclusion, chronic contractile activity induces the expression of MCT1 but not MCT4. This increase in MCT1 alone was sufficient to increase lactate uptake from the circulation.

No abstract

Rates of lactate uptake into giant sarcolemmal vesicles were determined in vesicles collected from rat muscles at rest and immediately after 10 min of intense muscle contraction. This contraction period reduced muscle glycogen rapidly by 37-82% in all muscles examined (P < 0.05) except the soleus muscle (no change P > 0.05). At an external lactate concentration of 1 mM lactate, uptake into giant sarcolemmal vesicles was not altered (P > 0.05), whereas at an external lactate concentration of 20 mM, the rate of lactate uptake was increased by 64% (P < 0.05). Concomitantly, the plasma membrane content of monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)1 was reduced slightly (-10%, P < 0.05), and the plasma membrane content of MCT4 was reduced further (-25%, P < 0.05). In additional studies, the 10-min contraction period increased the plasma membrane GLUT4 (P < 0.05) while again reducing MCT4 (-20%, P < 0.05) but not MCT1 (P > 0.05). These studies have shown that intense muscle contraction can increase the initial rates of lactate uptake, but only when the external lactate concentrations are high (20 mM). We speculate that muscle contraction increases the intrinsic activity of the plasma membrane MCTs, because the increase in lactate uptake occurred while plasma membrane MCT4 was decreased and plasma membrane MCT1 was reduced only minimally, or not at all.

No abstract