A variety of graft sources have been used for ACL reconstruction to improve functions and kinematics in ACL deficient knees. The two most commonly used autogenous grafts are the central third of the patellar tendon and the hamstring tendon constructs. The choice of different grafts and different construct influence the final clinical outcome of ACL reconstruction. The 3 groups, of 25 patients each, were generated by choosing the technique (PT tendon, 4 strand hamstring, and single hamstring plus extraarticular plasty) to utilize and followed for 5 years, with an alternate systematic sampling. Our comparison has shown significant kneeling pain in the patellar tendon with respect to the groups with hamstrings techniques. Single hamstring plus extraarticular plasty achieved subjective score significantly higher with respect to the other two groups as well as for the time to resume sport. The study confirms that patellar tendon and hamstring can be equivalent options for ACL reconstruction. This study demonstrated that a superior outcome as far as subjective clinical findings were concerned, was obtained in group III. Patients in the latter group were also able to return to sports sooner than those in the bone-patellar tendon graft group and the four-strand hamstring group.

The original technique demonstrates highly satisfactory results. Factors negatively affecting the outcomes are meniscectomy and laxity. In this series, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral plasty shows maintenance of knee stability at long-term follow-up. Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with extra-articular tenodesis does not appear to be greater than after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions without extra-articular augmentation as reported in historical controls.

No abstract

Meniscal substitution is a fundamental procedure to prevent osteoarthritis of the knee after massive meniscectomy. Stone, Steadman and Rodkey have developed a bioreadsorbable collagen matrix (CMI) which acts as a scaffold to restore the original medial meniscal. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the results of CMI implantation at a follow up from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 8 years. Eight patients (mean age 25) were evaluated at a final observation point from 6 to 8 years after CMI implantation. Inclusion criteria were an irreparable meniscal tear or a previous meniscectomy involving the medial meniscus. Follow up evaluation included Cincinnati Knee Rating Scale (CKRS), IKDC, subjective evaluation and X-ray and MRI control. There were no complications related to the device. All patients were able to return to day activities without limitations 3 months after surgery. Both subjective CKRS score and objective IKDC score showed improvement in all cases except one patient with an ACL re-injury. In two cases scores were slightly worse from 2 years after surgery to the final observation point. The other five cases obtained maximum score at final follow-up. In four cases the absence of pain remained until the final observation point, while in four cases a low entity of pain was described at long term follow-up. MRI showed in five cases mixoid degeneration signal, two had normal signal with reduced size, while one patient had no recognizable implant. Six patients had preserved cartilage and articular space, with no changes respect to pre-op control. Arthroscopic second look evaluation has been performed in three cases, revealing in two cases the presence of the implant, although with a reduced size respect to the original one, while in one case the CMI was almost disappeared. Our small series of eight patients prospectively followed from 6 to 8 years of follow-up has shown highly satisfactory results. Although the aspect of the implant was mostly abnormal, the implant may have helped reduce the deterioration of the knee joint at final observation time.

Several investigators have reported the presence of biomechanical, kinematic, anatomic, fiber orientation patterns and biological differences between the anteromedial bundle and the posterolateral bundle of ACL. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical, instrumental and X-ray outcome of two ACL reconstruction techniques with hamstring tendons: one with a single intra-articular bundle associated to an extra-articular sling, the second with a more anatomic double-bundle technique that reproduces better the native ACL function. From an initial group of 100 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, 72 patients (35 single bundle plus lateral plasty and 37 double bundle) were evaluated with IKDC, Tegner score, KT2000 arthrometer, Activity Rating Scale, Psychovitality Questionnaire and Ahlback radiographic score at a mean 3 years follow-up. Double-bundle group showed significantly better results regarding IKDC, ROM, Activity Rating Scale and time to return to sport. Also KT 2000 showed significant differences in objective stability. The double-bundle technique for ACL reconstruction described in this paper has demonstrated significantly better subjective, objective and functional results compared with a double-stranded hamstrings plus extra-articular sling at a minimum 3-year follow-up.