In cirrhotic livers, increased resistance to portal flow, in part due to an exaggerated response to vasoconstrictors, is the primary factor in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension. Our aim was to evaluate the response of the intrahepatic circulation of cirrhotic rat livers to the I n cirrhotic livers, increased resistance to portal blood flow is the primary factor in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension. 1 This increased resistance is determined in part by the architectural distortion of the hepatic structure caused by cirrhosis. However, substantial evidence shows that a dynamic component, caused by the active contraction of vascular and extravascular contractile cells, plays a major role in further increasing intrahepatic resistance. 2 This dynamic component of hepatic vascular resistance is believed to be the consequence of an imbalance between the vasodilator/vasoconstrictor forces that regulate hepatic vascular tone. 1 In addition, the hepatic vascular resistance of cirrhotic livers exhibits a hyperresponse to several vasoconstrictors, such as endothelin 1, 3 norepinephrine, 4 or leukotriene D 4 . 5 Nitric oxide blunts the response of the hepatic vascular bed to several vasoconstrictors, 6 and its production is decreased in the cirrhotic liver. It is therefore possible that an insufficient availability of NO 7 could account for the hyperresponse to vasoconstrictors observed in cirrhotic livers.In addition, it has been shown that the activation of G protein-coupled receptors, such as those for ␣ 1 -adrenergic agonists, vasopressin, or endothelin 1, stimulates release of arachidonic acid, leading to the formation of its vasoactive-derived metabolites, including prostaglandins (PGs), thromboxanes (TXs), and leukotrienes. [8][9][10] Cyclooxygenase (COX)

The mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing regulation are poorly understood. Here we dissect how the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal L30 protein blocks splicing of its pre-mRNA upon binding a kink-turn structure including the 5' splice site. We show that L30 binds the nascent RPL30 transcript without preventing recognition of the 5' splice site by U1 snRNP but blocking U2 snRNP association with the branch site. Interaction of the factors BBP and Mud2 with the intron, relevant for U2 snRNP recruitment, is not affected by L30. Furthermore, the functions of neither the DEAD-box protein Sub2 in the incipient spliceosome nor the U2 snRNP factor Cus2 on branch site recognition are required for L30 inhibition. These findings contrast with the effects caused by binding a heterologous protein to the same region, completely blocking intron recognition. Collectively, our data suggest that L30 represses a spliceosomal rearrangement required for U2 snRNP association with the transcript.

Pre-mRNA splicing is catalyzed by the spliceosome, and its control is essential for correct gene expression. While splicing repressors typically interfere with transcript recognition by spliceosomal components, the yeast protein L30 blocks spliceosomal rearrangements required for the engagement of U2 snRNP (small ribonucleoprotein particle) to its own transcript RPL30. Using a mutation in the RPL30 binding site that disrupts this repression, we have taken a genetic approach to reveal that regulation of splicing is restored in this mutant by deletion of the cap-binding complex (CBC) component Cbp80. Indeed, our data indicate that Cbp80 plays distinct roles in the recognition of the intron by U1 and U2 snRNP. It promotes the initial 59 splice site recognition by U1 and, independently, facilitates U2 recruitment, depending on sequences located in the vicinity of the 59 splice site. These results reveal a novel function for CBC in splicing and imply that these molecular events can be the target of a splicing regulator.