Background Hypertension (HTN) is highly prevalent among people with HIV (PWH) in Namibia, but screening and treatment for HTN are not routinely offered as part of HIV care delivery. We report the implementation of a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) to accelerate integration of HTN and HIV care within public-sector health facilities in Namibia. Methods Twenty-four facilities participated in the QIC with the aim of increasing HTN screening and treatment among adult PWH (>15 years). HTN was defined according to national treatment guidelines (i.e., systolic blood pressure >140 and/or diastolic blood pressure >90 across three measurements and at least two occasions), and decisions regarding initiation of treatment were made by physicians only. Teams from participating hospitals used quality improvement methods, monthly measurement of performance indicators, and small-scale tests of change to implement contextually tailored interventions. Coaching of sites was performed on a monthly basis by clinical officers with expertise in QI and HIV, and sites were convened as part of learning sessions to facilitate diffusion of effective interventions. Results Between March 2017 and March 2018, hypertension screening occurred as part of 183,043 (86%) clinical encounters at participating facilities. Among 1,759 PWH newly diagnosed with HTN, 992 (56%) were initiated on first-line treatment. Rates of treatment initiation were higher in facilities with an on-site physician (61%) compared to those without one (51%). During the QIC, facility teams identified fourteen interventions to improve HTN screening and treatment. Among barriers to implementation, teams pointed to malfunctions of blood pressure machines and stock outs of antihypertensive medications as common challenges. Conclusions Implementation of a QIC provided a structured approach for integrating HTN and HIV services across 24 high-volume facilities in Namibia. As rates of HTN treatment remained low despite ongoing facility-level changes, policy-level interventions—such as task sharing and supply chain strengthening—should be pursued to further improve delivery of HTN care among PWH beyond initial screening.

Adverse effects linked to antiretroviral therapy (ART) may contribute to poor adherence on the patient’s side. Consequently, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance mutations could emerge, negatively impacting the body’s immune system. Meanwhile, severe immunosuppression can lead to several conditions, including anemia. The cause of anemia in HIV infection is multifactorial, and can be mainly explained by deleterious direct effects of the virus on the bone marrow, and opportunistic infections such as Parvovirus B19. Other causes include blood loss resulting from neoplasms and gastrointestinal lesions. Moreover, anemia can also be caused by antiretroviral drugs. We report a case of persistent anemia after ART initiation, kidney injury and treatment failure following a lengthy period of non-adherence to ART. The anemia was classified as Pure Red Cell Aplasia (PRCA). With treatment modification, the anemia resolved and the patient attained virologic suppression. Lamivudine (3TC) was pointed out as the cause of PRCA, which resolved after its withdrawal from the ART regimen. This rare side effect should be investigated in patients on 3TC who present with recurrent anemia.

Myocarditis and pericarditis are frequent complications of COVID-19, but have also been reported following vaccination against COVID-19 in adolescents. To build vaccine confidence and inform policy, we characterized the incidence of myocarditis/pericarditis in adolescents following BNT162b2 vaccination and explored the association with dose and sex. We searched national and international databases for studies reporting the incidence of myocarditis/pericarditis following BNT162b2 vaccination as the primary endpoint. The intra-study risk of bias was appraised, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled incidence by dose stratified by sex. The pooled incidence of myocarditis/pericarditis was 4.5 (95%CI: 3.14–6.11) per 100,000 vaccinations across all doses. Compared to dose 1, the risk was significantly higher after dose 2 (RR: 8.62, 95%CI: 5.71–13.03). However, adolescents experienced a low risk after a booster dose than after dose 2 (RR: 0.06; 95%CI: 0.04–0.09). Males were approximately seven times (RR: 6.66, 95%CI: 4.77–4.29) more likely than females to present myocarditis/pericarditis. In conclusion, we found a low frequency of myocarditis/pericarditis after BNT162b2, which occurred predominantly after the second dose in male adolescents. The prognosis appears to be favorable, with full recovery in both males and females. National programs are recommended to adopt the causality framework to reduce overreporting, which undercuts the value of the COVID-19 vaccine on adolescent life, as well as to extend the inter-dose interval policy, which has been linked to a lower frequency of myocarditis/pericarditis.

The Namibia national antiretroviral therapy guidelines recommend that patients living with HIV who interrupt antiretrovirals and in the process disengage from care be restarted on their usual antiretroviral therapy regimen upon return. We introduce a 39-year-old male patient on first-line antiretroviral therapy, namely, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine and efavirenz, from 2015 to 2019 (4 years), who returned to care after the fourth episode of interrupting his treatment, though his adherence to antiretroviral therapy was deemed poor. Thus, he presented with severe immunosuppression and an AIDS-defining condition. Hence, he was switched to second-line antiretroviral therapy, treated with fluconazole for oesophageal candidiasis and reinitiated on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. The client is currently clinically stable with a suppressed viral load. Medical and drug history taking with an emphasis on the previous history of treatment failure in patients returning to care are paramount in guiding the choice of future prescriptions of antiretrovirals. The multiple antiretroviral therapy interruptions from the patient and the delay in decision-making on the side of the clinician to switch treatments contributed to the emergence of an AIDS-defining condition.

No abstract