This economic analysis of physician assistant/associate (PA) career earnings sought to assess the increasing effect of student debt, its potential effect on job selection, and whether such financial obligations may influence graduates to select higher-paying specialties. The model was a 30-year-old newly graduated PA who begins working in family medicine. A simulation included wages, student debt, national household expenditures, and real estate statistics. The scenario consisted of a high and middle cost of living in two geographic areas, a family of four, and an average life expectancy. Using a validated economic program, a series of calculations produced the financial effect on moderate-income levels and expenditures based on median PA earnings. On the deficit side is education debt, loan repayment, financing a house, college for children, retirement, and discretionary spending. Weighted variables were used to maximize the sensitivity effect of the simulation. A Monte Carlo probabilistic program predicted the likely outcome of income, expenses, inflation, and investments. Furthermore, the lifetime earnings of a PA who retires at age 67 years and lives to age 85 years falls in the 75th percentile of income of all Americans. The conclusion is that a full-time PA career in any clinical role is as economically rewarding as it is satisfying.
About 85,000 melanomas are diagnosed every year in the United States, but only about 3.2% are diagnosed without a primary site. This article describes a patient who presented with two rapidly growing axillary masses and was found to have metastatic melanoma of the lymph nodes with no known primary site. Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) site is staged either III or IV level. Management is determined in the same manner as stage-matched melanoma of known primary site.
Introduction The aim of this pilot study was to assess whether supplemental psychiatry training in the didactic year increases the scores on the Physician Assistant Education Association (PAEA) Psychiatry and Behavioral Health End of Rotation examination and psychiatry preceptor evaluation. Methods Data were obtained from the physician assistant (PA) students on PAEA Psychiatry and Behavioral Health End of Rotation examination and psychiatry preceptor evaluation for a single institution. Then, a comparison was performed for PA students who did not participate in supplemental psychiatry/behavioral health training (Cohort 1/historical control group; n = 62) and PA students who participated in supplemental psychiatric and behavioral health training (Cohort 2/experimental group; n = 63) to determine the effects of the groups. Results An independent t test demonstrated that the experimental group performed significantly better than the control group on both the Psychiatry and Behavioral Health PAEA End of Rotation examination and preceptor evaluation {control group (M = 83.4) and experimental group (M = 86.3; t[117] = 2.8; P < .05)} and the preceptor evaluation {control group (M = 90) and experimental group (M = 92.6; t[112] = 2.1; P < .05)}. In addition, both analyses demonstrated a moderate effect size (End of Rotation examination, d = 0.51; preceptor, d = 0.62). A multiple regression analysis was used to control for age, sex, grade point average (GPA), and training intervention. Age, sex, and GPA were found not to affect the results. However, treatment intervention was statistically significant for both the End of Rotation examination and preceptor evaluation scores. Discussion Supplemental training in behavioral health and psychiatry, which included a standardized patient encounter and an interactive session dedicated to psychiatry interviewing techniques, resulted in students performing better on the Psychiatry and Behavioral Health PAEA End of Rotation examination and preceptor evaluation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.