The extrinsic and intrinsic forelimb musculature of the lesser grison (Galictis cuja), a short-legged mustelid of southern South America, is studied for the first time. We present descriptions, muscular maps, and weight data. Muscular anatomy description of the lesser grison provides the framework for discussing the myological diversity of mustelids and other caniforms, for addressing nomenclatural problems (such as synonymy and homonymy), and for highlighting some functional and phylogenetically informative traits. We recognize in the lesser grison features shared by all mustelid species, and some other caniforms, especially mephitids, such as the presence of rhomboideus profundus, an angular head of triceps brachii, and, apparently, the absence of a flexor digitorum brevis manus. An unexpected record of articularis humeri, a proximal origin of the brachioradialis, and the absence of the tensor fascia antebrachii are recorded for this species. As other ictonychines and mustelines, Galictis cuja possesses stronger and subdivided protractors and sagittal rotators of the forelimbs, as well as shoulder and elbow extensors. These features allow for resistance in landing during bounds and increase the stride length during epigean and subterranean crouched locomotion. Powerful neck musculature assists during hunting and carrying of prey. Weakness of some retractors and intrinsic flexors is related to a relatively minor importance of the forelimbs as propellers during bounding and the lack of other specializations. The configuration of the rhomboideus and the absence of coracobrachialis seem to be informative at the subfamiliar level within Mustelidae. The comprehensive and comparative review of available information leads us to propose possible solutions to old nomenclatural problems and of identification. This allows us to reassess of some myological features as diagnostic of caniform clades.

Extant felids are morphologically homogeneous, probably as a result of recent radiation and constraints from their predatory specializations. The Neotropical assemblage comprises 12 of the 41 extant felid species, which occupy all habitats available, with many species coexisting locally. We studied this assemblage on the basis of 31 craniodental variables reflecting morphofunctional variation, measured from 229 specimens representing all 12 species. Multivariate patterns were summarized allowing for phylogenetic covariation. Additional factors (geographical distribution, use of habitat and stratum, and activity pattern) were coded for each species. As expected, body size accounted for most variation, covarying with membership to three deep clades and, to a lesser extent, with large-scale geographic variation. The species tend to segregate in morphospace plus one or more factors (e.g. habits) that make interspecific overlap in niche space minimal. Using dated phylogenies, biogeographic history, and the fossil record, we reconstructed the historical assembly of the Neotropical felid guild. We found a pattern of successive invasions and speciation in which new lineages occupied previously vacant areas of morphospace, or new species occupied overlapping areas but with contrasting habits. This may be general among antagonistic species of historically structured guilds, and we predict similar patterns in other continents.

Mustelids are a morphofunctionally diversified group. However, there are no descriptions of the postcranial musculature of South American mustelid species except for some comments from the 19th century. Here, we present the first description of the myology of the hind limbs, and lumbar, sacral, and caudal regions of the lesser grison (Galictis cuja), a short-legged South American mustelid, including muscle maps and weight data. We interpret the function and the evolution of several muscular features within a comparative framework and through the optimization of these traits onto a phylogeny. The configuration of the axial musculature (e.g., m. quadratus lumborum with short bundles, heavy iliocostalis, and forward originated sacrocaudalis dorsalis) and the presence of strong ankle musculature are features shared with mustelines and, to a lesser degree, with other musteloids. These could be related to a high mobility of the axial skeleton and strong control of the movement of the ankle joint, in relation to the acquisition of epigean bounding gaits, a crouched locomotion, and enhanced maneuverability inside burrows. We recorded many phylogenetically significant traits, shared with other arctoids (e.g., subdivision of m. gluteus profundus and semimembranosus, presence of a single belly for m. sartorius, and absence of articularis coxae) or exclusively musteloids (e.g., frequent fusion between m. piriformis and gluteus medius). Some features (e.g., restricted origin of the caudal belly of the m. semitendinosus, absence of gluteofemoralis, and unusually complex fibularis brevis) seem to be derived conditions acquired in some mustelid clades. Our results sustain the value of myological data for functional and phylogenetic studies.

No abstract