ABSTRACT.Purpose: To quantify subjective visual metamorphopsia in newly diagnosed patients suffering from diabetic macular oedema (DME) and other macular abnormalities and to evaluate anti-VEGF treatment effect. Methods: Patients with DME, subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or retinal venous occlusion (RVO) were recruited. Metamorphopsia score (Mscore) was calculated using MCharts at baseline and at the end of a series of anti-VEGF injections. Results: Fifteen eyes of 10 patients with DME, 14 eyes of 13 patients with AMD-CNV and five patients with RVO were included in this study. At baseline, positive Mscore was observed in 46.6% of eyes with DME, 50% of eyes with AMD-CNV and four of five eyes with RVO. Treatment led to a complete metamorphopsia reduction (Mscore = 0) in 71.4% of DME patients, 35.7% of AMD and 0% of RVO patients. Conclusion: We suggest that the M-charts may serve as an additional test for diagnosis and follow-up, complementary to morphological evaluation by imaging, in diabetic patients facing their first anti-VEGF treatment.
Background There is a paucity of data regarding demodicidosis-associated facial hyperpigmentation.Objective To delineate the clinical, dermoscopic, and histopathologic features of demodicidosis-associated facial hyperpigmentation.Methods Clinical and diagnostic data were collected from the medical files of patients who were referred to our outpatient dermatology clinic in 2006-2019 for evaluation of facial hyperpigmentation and were diagnosed with demodicidosis. ResultsThe cohort included 19 patients (13 male) aged 42-76 years, all with Fitzpatrick skin type 3-4. All presented with mostly asymptomatic dusky, brown-gray, facial pigmentation, localized or diffuse with background erythema in 36.8% of cases, and skin roughness in 26.3%. Dermoscopy yielded characteristic findings of white gelatinous or opaque protrusions from hair follicles or infiltration of follicular openings with an amorphic material. A specific finding was perifollicular and reticulated pigmentation of the affected areas. Findings were confirmed on microscopic (n = 7) and histopathologic (n = 5) studies. Anti-demodectic treatment led to complete (73.6%) or partial (23.4%) resolution of pigmentation within 2 years. ConclusionWe describe unique clinicopathological and dermoscopic findings associated with an under-recognized type of facial hyperpigmentation caused by demodex for which we propose the term "pigmented demodicidosis." Demodicidosis should be added to the list of causes of facial hyperpigmentation.
Background and Objective: This pilot study evaluated the clinical utility of the MacuFlow software in measuring metamorphopsia prior to and following surgery in patients with vitreoretinal diseases. Patients and Methods: Four patients with vitreoretinal disorders causing metamorphopsia were included in this pilot study. Visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography and MacuFlow scores were recorded prior to and following surgical intervention. Results: The mean preoperative VA was 0.59 ± 0.09 logMAR, central macular thickness 491.2 ± 41.3 µm and calculated macular volume 8.99 ±1.47 mm3. These parameters improved postoperatively to a mean VA of 0.30 ± 0.22 logMAR, central macular thickness of 372.8 ± 85.4 µm and macular volume of 7.94 ± 1.34 mm3 but did not reach statistical significance. The mean preoperative MacuFlow score was 14.02 ± 8.21, which significantly improved postoperatively to 5.4 ± 3.13 (p = 0.045). Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate the clinical utility of MacuFlow for the quantification of metamorphopsia and its improvement or resolution following surgery. This simple method may be a valuable addition for the clinical assessment and monitoring of patients with retinal diseases causing metamorphopsia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.