BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Retinal diffusion restrictions were recently identified as a regular finding in acute central retinal artery occlusion. We sought to investigate the influence of technical MR imaging and clinical parameters on the detection rate of retinal diffusion restrictions on standard brain DWI. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In this retrospective cohort study, MR imaging scans of patients with central retinal artery occlusion were assessed by 2 readers for retinal diffusion restrictions on DWI performed within 2 weeks after vision loss. The influence of clinical and technical MR imaging parameters and the time interval between symptom onset and DWI on the presence of retinal diffusion restrictions were evaluated. RESULTS:One hundred twenty-seven patients (mean age, 69.6 [SD 13.9] years; 59 women) and 131 DWI scans were included. Overall, the MR imaging sensitivity of retinal diffusion restrictions in acute central retinal artery occlusion was 62.6%-67.2%. Interrater and intrarater agreement for retinal diffusion restrictions was "substantial" with k inter ¼ 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57-0.83) and k intra ¼ 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.88). Detection of retinal diffusion restrictions did not differ with differences in field strengths (1.5 versus 3T, P ¼ .35) or sequence type (P ¼ .22). Retinal diffusion restrictions were consistently identified within the first week with a peak sensitivity of 79% in DWI performed within 24 hours after symptom onset. Sensitivity of retinal diffusion restrictions declined in the second week (10.0%, P , .001). Absence of retinal diffusion restrictions was more prevalent in patients without fundoscopic retinal edema (60% versus 27.1%, P ¼ .004) and with restitution of visual acuity at discharge (75% versus 28.4%, P ¼ .006).CONCLUSIONS: Retinal diffusion restrictions in acute central retinal artery occlusion can be reliably identified on DWI performed within 24 hours and 1 week after onset of visual impairment. Detectability of retinal diffusion restrictions is dependent on the clinical course of the disease.ABBREVIATIONS: CRAO ¼ central retinal artery occlusion; logMAR ¼ Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution; RDR ¼ retinal diffusion restrictions; VA ¼ visual acuity S udden and painless monocular visual impairment is the characteristic clinical feature of nonarteritic acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), which is mainly caused by proximal embolism originating from the heart or atherosclerotic lesions of the aortic arch and carotid arteries. 1 Patients with CRAO develop persistent and debilitating central scotoma if the blood supply to

AimsTo investigate the retinal vascular structure and capillary anomalies of affected and fellow eyes of patients with unilateral Coats’ disease using multimodal imaging.MethodsClinical investigation of both eyes of each patient with diagnosed Coats’ disease using ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus imaging, including UWF fluorescein angiography (UWFFA), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A).ResultsWe analysed 38 eyes of 19 patients with unilateral Coats’ disease and found that all fellow eyes (19/19; 100%) revealed vascular alterations, detected by UWFFA, predominantly located in the temporal periphery. Thereby, 89% of the fellow eyes (17/19) presented capillary bed abnormalities, that did not exceed the capillary level; 58% (11/19) presented tortuous abnormalities and 26% (5/19) presented microaneurysmatic abnormalities, exceeding the capillary level. If primarily affected eyes presented central Coats’ specific vascular abnormalities, fellow eyes revealed tortuous vascular abnormalities twice as often (78% (7/9) vs 40% (4/10); P=0.096). In primarily affected eyes, a tendency towards larger foveal avascular zones was revealed, compared to fellow eyes (0.28±0.16 mm2 vs 0.20±0.10 mm2; P=0.123).ConclusionThe use of modern multimodal imaging allows the detection of even subtle vascular changes in fellow eyes of patients with Coats’ disease. Coats’ disease appears to be a bilateral ocular disease with a predominant manifestation in one eye of the affected patients.

Purpose To investigate retinal microstructure differences in central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) patients with and without visible retinal diffusion restriction (RDR) on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). Methods Consecutive CRAO patients with available optical coherence tomography (OCT) and DWI, both performed within 7 days after symptom onset, were included in a retrospective cohort study. The OCT scans were reviewed to assess retinal layer thickness, optical intensity and structural integrity. The OCT findings were compared between patients with and without visible RDR on DWI using Mann-Whitney U or Pearson’s Χ2 test. Results A total of 56 patients (mean age 70.8 ± 12.8 years) were included. RDR was observed in 38 subjects (67.9%) with visually correlating low ADC map in 26 of 38 cases (68.4%). Superior and inferior parafoveal macular thickness measurements (SMT, IMT) of RDR negative patients were significantly lower when compared to RDR+ patients (370.5 ± 43.8 µm vs. 418.2 ± 76.0 µm, p = 0.016; 374.4 ± 42.9 µm vs. 428.8 ± 63.2 µm, p = 0.004) due to differences in inner retinal layer thickness (IRLT, 188.8 ± 34.4 µm vs. 234.7 ± 49.0 µm, p = 0.002). IRLT values of RDR negative patients were higher in 1.5T compared to 3T the DWI (205.0 ± 26.0 µm vs. 168.6 ± 32.8 µm, p = 0.026). Conclusions Detectability of RDR is likely contingent upon the degree of ischemic retinal swelling in CRAO. Technical adjustments to the DWI protocol, such as increased field strength, may improve visibility of RDR.