Monolithic columns for capillary electrochromatography have been prepared within the confines of untreated fused-silica capillaries in a single step by a simple copolymerization of mixtures of butyl methacrylate, ethylene dimethacrylate, and 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propane-sulfonic acid (AMPS) in the presence of a porogenic solvent. The use of these novel macroporous monoliths eliminates the need for frits, the difficulties encountered with packed capillaries, and capillary surface functionalization. Since the porous properties of the monolithic materials can be easily tailored through changes in the composition of the ternary porogenic solvent, the effects of both pore size and the percentage of sulfonic acid monomer on the efficiency and the electroosmotic flow velocity of the capillary columns could be studied independently over a broad range. A simple increase in the content of charged functionalities within the monolith leads to an expected acceleration of the flow velocity. However, increasing the pore size leads to a substantial deterioration of the efficiency of the separation. In contrast, monoliths with increasing levels of AMPS in which the pore size remains fixed due to adjustments in the composition of the porogenic solvent show no deterioration in efficiency while maintaining the same increase in flow velocity, thus producing a significant reduction in separation time. Additionally, measurements on monoliths with constant levels of AMPS but different pore sizes suggest that flow velocity may be affected by the flow resistance within the capillary column.
Rigid, monolithic capillary columns for reversed-phase electrochromatography have been prepared within the confines of untreated fused-silica capillaries in a single step by a simple copolymerization of ethylene dimethacrylate, butyl methacrylate, and 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid in the presence of a porogenic solvent. The composition of the specifically designed ternary porogenic solvent allows fine control of the porous properties of the monolithic material over a broad range. While the electroosmotic flow through these capillary columns increases with both increasing pore size of the monolith and content of charged functionalities, better chromatographic properties have been observed for monoliths with larger surface area and hydrophobicity. Using this technique, monolithic capillary columns with an efficiency higher than 120000 plates/m have been easily obtained.
The effect of chromatographic conditions on the performance of monolithic poly(butyl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate-co-2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid) columns in capillary electrochromatography has been studied. The flow velocity was found to be proportional to the strength of the electric field and both the pH and the composition of the mobile phase. A column efficiency of 120,000 plates/m at the optimum flow velocity of 1.5 cm/min is achieved for all the monolithic capillary columns of identical composition and porosity, regardless of their length, which varied from 30 to 120 cm. The polymeric separation medium exhibits retention and selectivity properties similar to those of typical ODS packings for reversed-phase chromatography. In addition to the "classical" use of monolithic capillary columns for the electrochromatographic separation of small molecules in reversed-phase mode, larger styrene oligomers were also separated under isocratic elution conditions. In addition, the electroosmotically driven size exclusion chromatography of polystyrene standards with molecular weights up to 10(6) has been demonstrated for the first time.
Ttypsin immobilization onto continuous "molded" rods of porous poly(glycidy1 methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) and some applications of the conjugate have been studied. The rods polymerized within a tubular mold (chromatographic column), were treated in situ with ethylenediamine, activated with glutaraldehyde and finally modified with trypsin. The performance of the trypsinmodified rods was evaluated and compared to that of poly(glycidy1 methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethactylate) beads, modified with the same enzyme. Overall the enzyme-modified rods performed substantially better than the corresponding beads. In particular, the performance of the molded supports as enzymatic reactors or as chromatographic media benefits greatly from the enhanced mass transfer that is characteristic of the molded rod at high flow rates. 0 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
A process for the separation of styrene oligomers and polymers by size and composition using a novel separation medium has been demonstrated. The process involves precipitation of the macromolecules on the molded macroporous rod columns, followed by progressive elution utilizing a simple gradient of the mobile phase. Molded macroporous rod columns are ideally suited for this technique because convection through the large pores of the rod enhances the mass transport of large analyte molecules and accelerates the separation process. Styrene oligomers and polymers are separated in a 50-mm x 8-mm-i.d. column using a solvent gradient composed of a poor solvent such as water, methanol, or acetonitrile and increasing amounts of a good solvent, tetrahydrofuran. Excellent separations are obtained, demonstrating that precipitation-redissolution can be a suitable alternate to size exclusion chromatography (SEC) of some polymers. Compared to SEC, the gradient elution separation can be achieved at higher flow rates in a much shorter time. Precipitation-redissolution with gradient elution can also be used for the separation of copolymers, for which the process is controlled not only by molecular weight but also by the composition of the copolymers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.