Drug sensitivity and resistance are conventionally quantified by IC50 or Emax values, but these metrics are highly sensitive to the number of divisions taking place over the course of a response assay. The dependency of IC50 and Emax on division rate creates artefactual correlations between genotype and drug sensitivity while obscuring valuable biological insights and interfering with biomarker discovery. We derive alternative drug response metrics that are insensitive to division number. These are based on estimating the magnitude of drug-induced growth rate inhibition (GR) using endpoint or time-course assays. We show that GR50 and GRmax are superior to conventional metrics for assessing the effects of drugs in dividing cells. Moreover, adopting GR metrics requires only modest changes in experimental protocols. We expect GR metrics to improve the study of cell signaling and growth using drugs, discovery of drug response biomarkers, and identification of drugs effective on specific patient-derived tumor cells.
SUMMARY The target profiles of many drugs are established early in their development and are not systematically revisited at the time of FDA approval. Thus, it is often unclear whether therapeutics with the same nominal targets but different chemical structures are functionally equivalent. In this paper we use five different phenotypic and biochemical assays to compare approved inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 – collectively regarded as breakthroughs in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. We find that transcriptional, proteomic, and phenotypic changes induced by palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib differ significantly; abemaciclib in particular has advantageous activities partially overlapping those of alvocidib, an older polyselective CDK inhibitor. In cells and mice, abemaciclib inhibits kinases other than CDK4/6 including CDK2/Cyclin A/E – implicated in resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition – and CDK1/Cyclin B. The multi-faceted experimental and computational approaches described here therefore uncover under-appreciated differences in CDK4/6 inhibitor activities with potential importance in treating human patients.
We have identified a new murine orphan member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, termed mCAR, that is closely related to the previously described human orphan MB67, referred to here as hCAR. Like hCAR, mCAR expression is highest in liver. In addition to the most abundant mCAR1 isoform, the mCAR gene expresses a truncated mCAR2 variant that is missing the C-terminal portion of the ligand binding/dimerization domain. The mCAR gene has 8 introns, and this mCAR2 variant is generated by a splicing event that skips the 8th exon. mCAR1, like hCAR, binds as a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor to the retinoic acid response element from the promoter of the retinoic acid receptor 2 isoform. Consistent with its lack of a critical heterodimerization interface, the mCAR2 variant does not bind this site. Both mCAR1 and hCAR are apparently constitutive transcriptional activators. This activity is dependent on the presence of the conserved C-terminal AF-2 transcriptional activation motif. As expected from its inability to bind DNA, the mCAR2 variant neither transactivates by itself nor inhibits transactivation by hCAR or mCAR1.The nuclear hormone receptor superfamily includes the receptors for a number of potent biological regulators, such as steroids, retinoids, and thyroid hormone. With the recent addition of nuclear prostaglandin receptors (1, 2), and an oxysterol receptor (3), there are now more than 15 genes in mammalian genomes that encode such conventional receptors. An even larger set of genes encodes the orphan receptors, which are related to the conventional receptors but do not have known ligands. Particularly since individual genes for superfamily members frequently encode more than one isoform as a consequence of either alternative promoter utilization or alternative mRNA splicing, the total number of proteins that belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily is large.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.