No abstract

This study is a survey of the overall clinical results achieved with our pain treatment method, percutaneous epidural low-frequency (1.6-8.0 Hz) spinal cord stimulation. It examines the relationship between the effectiveness of epidural spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) and diseases or sites of pain. Continuous indwelling of the catheter electrodes in the posterior epidural space ranged from 3 to 67 days, and the duration of percutaneous ESCS varied from less than 1 wk to more than 1 yr. Complete pain relief (100%) was achieved during stimulation in 11.5% of the patients (52 of 454). Complete (100%) to partial (more than 30%) pain relief occurred in 71.1% of the patients. In six (1.3%) patients pain was aggravated by stimulation. Analgesics and/or sedatives were discontinued completely after treatment in 52 patients (11.5%) and reduced in 263 patients (57.9%). The number of patients who rated pain relief better than 50% was significantly more in carcinoma/sarcoma and causalgia (P < 0.001), and significantly less in postherpetic neuralgia and thromboangitis obliterans/arterial sclerosis obliterans (P < 0.001) than the average in all diseases. There was a significantly high responsiveness to ESCS in female patients in comparison to male patients (P < 0.05). Pain in the head/face, neck/upper extremities, and trunk responded more to ESCS than pain in the lower extremities. Alleviation of pain by ESCS was lower when the verbal pain score was high. There were no major complications in percutaneous ESCS. Thus, we have demonstrated that pain-alleviating effects of ESCS varies significantly by disease and site of pain, and that this simple percutaneous method can be used for a relatively long period.

These fine flexible fiberscopes may provide new diagnostic and interventional tools for spinal canal diseases, provided skilled techniques are applied.