Across species, individuals within a population differ in their level of boldness in social encounters with conspecifics. This boldness phenotype is often stable across both time and social context (e.g., reproductive versus agonistic encounters). Various neural and hormonal mechanisms have been suggested as underlying these stable phenotypic differences, which are often also described as syndromes, personalities, and coping styles. Most studies examining the neuroendocrine mechanisms associated with behavioral boldness examine subjects after they have engaged in a social interaction, whereas baseline neural activity that may predispose behavioral variation is understudied. The present study tests the hypotheses that physical characteristics, steroid hormone levels, and baseline variation in Ile3-vasopressin (VP, a.k.a., Arg8-vasotocin) signaling predispose social boldness. Behavioral boldness in agonistic and reproductive contexts was extensively quantified in male green anole lizards (Anolis carolinensis), an established research organism for social behavior research that provides a crucial comparison group to investigations of birds and mammals. We found high stability of boldness across time, and between agonistic and reproductive contexts. Next, immunofluorescence was used to colocalize VP neurons with phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (pS6), a proxy marker of neural activity. VP-pS6 colocalization within the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus was inversely correlated with aggression boldness, but not reproductive behavior boldness. Our findings suggest that baseline vasopressin release, rather than solely context-dependent release, plays a role in predisposing individuals toward stable levels of aggressive boldness toward conspecifics by inhibiting behavioral output in these contexts.
The plasticity of the developing brain can be observed following injury to the motor cortex and/or corticospinal tracts, the most commonly injured brain area in the pre- or peri-natal period. Factors such as timing of injury, lesion size, and lesion location may affect a single hemisphere’s ability to acquire bilateral motor representation. Bilateral motor representation of single hemisphere origin is most likely to occur if brain injury occurs before the age of 2 years; however, the link between injury etiology, reorganization type, and functional outcome is largely understudied. We performed a retrospective review to examine reorganized cortical motor maps identified through transcranial magnetic stimulation in a cohort of 52 patients. Subsequent clinical, anthropometric, and demographic information was recorded for each patient. Each patient’s primary hand motor cortex center of gravity, along with the Euclidian distance between reorganized and normally located motor cortices, was also calculated. The patients were classified into broad groups including reorganization type (inter- and intra-hemispheric motor reorganization), age at time of injury (before 2 years and after 2 years), and injury etiology (developmental disorders and acquired injuries). All measures were analyzed to find commonalities between motor reorganization type and injury etiology, function, and center of gravity distance. There was a significant effect of injury etiology on type of motor reorganization (P < 0.01), with 60.7% of patients with acquired injuries and 15.8% of patients with developmental disorders demonstrating interhemispheric motor reorganization. Within the inter-hemispheric motor reorganization group, ipsilaterally and contralaterally projecting hand motor cortex centers of gravity overlapped, indicating shared cortical motor representation. Furthermore, the data suggest significantly higher prevalence of bilateral motor representation from a single hemisphere in cases of acquired injuries compared to those of developmental origin. Functional outcome was found to be negatively affected by acquired injuries and inter-hemispheric motor reorganization relative to their respective developmental lesions and counterparts with intra-hemispheric motor reorganization. These results provide novel information regarding motor reorganization in the developing brain via an unprecedented cohort sample size and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is uniquely suited for use in understanding the principles of motor reorganization, thereby aiding in the development of more efficacious therapeutic techniques to improve functional recovery following motor cortex injury.
AimTo compare transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)‐derived measures of primary motor cortex (M1) physiology between children with and without Tourette syndrome, and to dimensionally analyze TMS measures with Tourette syndrome‐related symptom severity.MethodWe used a cross‐sectional experimental design. Sixty 8‐ to 12‐year‐old children participated (30 with Tourette syndrome: three females, mean age 10 years 10 months, standard deviation [SD] 1 year 3 months; 30 typically developing children: seven females, mean age 10 years 7 months, SD 1 year 3 months). In the group with Tourette syndrome, 15 (one female, mean age 10 years 11 months, SD 1 year 3 months) had comorbid attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), rated with the Conners, Third Edition and the parent‐reported ADHD rating scales. Tic severity was rated with the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale and urge severity with the Individualized Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale. M1 short‐interval cortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation were compared between diagnostic groups and, within the group with Tourette syndrome, correlated with symptom severity using linear mixed‐effects models for repeated measures.ResultsAccounting for ADHD, we found no difference in SICI or intracortical facilitation in those with Tourette syndrome versus typically developing children (p > 0.1). In the group with Tourette syndrome, reduced M1 SICI predicted greater total (p = 0.012) and global (p = 0.002) tic severity. There were no associations with urge severity (p > 0.5).InterpretationReduced M1 SICI is robustly associated with increased tic, but not urge, severity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.