Twenty-nine patients with congenital duodenal obstruction (DO) detected as a "double bubble" (DB) on antenatal ultrasound (US) or diagnosed postnatally were seen at the Women's and Children's Hospital between 1985 and 1994; 24 (83%) had antenatal scans, with 21 (87%) DBs visualised. The 3 fetuses with normal scans who developed DO postnatally had duodenal "windsocks". Five of the 24 scanned patients (21%) were found to have a DB before 20 weeks' gestation: 1 simple duodenal atresia, 2 duodenal atresias with chromosomal abnormalities (1 trisomy 21 and 1 triploidy), 1 biliary atresia with a pre-pyloric vein, and 1 malrotation. Sixteen (67%) cases were detected with scans after 20 weeks (range 28-36 weeks); 12 (75%) of these were done for polyhydramnios. In response to a questionnaire to 9 of the 16 parents whose fetuses underwent a late scan, 5 had had normal early scans elsewhere and 4 did not respond (4 of the remaining 7 had died and 3 were lost to follow-up). Eleven of the 29 patients (38%) had abnormal karyotypes, and 4 (22%) of the 18 with a normal karyotype had associated anomalies. Two sets of familial cases were noted. Early antenatal diagnosis of DO is possible in a minority of cases, and this early diagnosis may be associated with an increased risk of other pathology. Furthermore, early demonstration of a DB at routine US prior to 20 weeks allows appropriate counseling and the option of mid-trimester termination, whereas this is more difficult later in the pregnancy. In all cases detected antenatally, planning of delivery and parent counseling should be achieved.

Introduction Early pregnancy body mass index (BMI) is known to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes but does not account for body fat distribution. This study aimed to determine prospectively whether maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (SCFT) measured by ultrasound at the fetal morphology scan is a better predictor than BMI of mode of delivery and other pregnancy outcomes. Material and methods This was a prospective cohort study of women delivering singleton neonates at a tertiary public hospital. Women were included if they had appropriate images at the routine fetal anomaly ultrasound scan and delivered in the facility. The primary outcome was mode of delivery categorized as cesarean section or vaginal delivery. The relation between maternal SCFT and BMI was described using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The association of maternal abdominal SCFT BMI at booking‐in was compared with pregnancy outcomes using univariate linear and logistic regression. Results SCFT and BMI were obtained for 997 women. The median (interquartile range) SCFT was 15.3 mm (12.8‐19.6) and median (interquartile range) BMI 24.3 kg/m2 (21.7‐28.3). Maternal abdominal SCFT and BMI were highly correlated (R2 = 0.55). Both were significantly associated with cesarean delivery: SCFT per 5 mm (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18‐1.48; BMI per 5 kg/m2 OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15‐1.44. Conclusions Maternal abdominal SCFT and BMI were both significantly associated with cesarean delivery and other outcomes. More research is needed to define the strengths of maternal SCFT in predicting pregnancy outcomes.

No abstract