Context: The prescription of opioids after elective surgical procedures has been a contributing factor to the current opioid epidemic in North America. Objective: To examine the opioid prescribing practices and rates of opioid consumption among patients undergoing common sports medicine procedures. Data Sources: A systematic review of the electronic databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed was performed from database inception to December 2018. Study Selection: Two investigators independently identified all studies reporting on postoperative opioid prescribing practices and consumption after arthroscopic shoulder, knee, or hip surgery. A total of 119 studies were reviewed, with 8 meeting eligibility criteria. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: The quantity of opioids prescribed and used were converted to milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) for standardized reporting. The quality of each eligible study was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Results: A total of 8 studies including 816 patients with a mean age of 43.8 years were eligible for inclusion. A mean of 610, 197, and 613 MMEs were prescribed to patients after arthroscopic procedures of the shoulder, knee, and hip, respectively. At final follow-up, 31%, 34%, and 64% of the prescribed opioids provided after shoulder, knee, and hip arthroscopy, respectively, still remained. The majority of patients (64%) were unaware of the appropriate disposal methods for surplus medication. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair had the highest opioid consumption (471 MMEs), with 1 in 4 patients receiving a refill. Conclusion: Opioids are being overprescribed for arthroscopic procedures of the shoulder, knee, and hip, with more than one-third of prescribed opioids remaining postoperatively. The majority of patients are unaware of the appropriate disposal techniques for surplus opioids. Appropriate risk stratification tools and evidence-based recommendations regarding pain management strategies after arthroscopic procedures are needed to help curb the growing opioid crisis.
Background: The orthopedic conditions and systemic comorbidities that occur in patients who require bone block tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis have made this procedure associated with a higher-than-normal risk of nonunion, graft collapse, hardware failure, and amputation. Here, we present a novel approach to bone block TTC arthrodesis using adjunctive osteoinductive agents and a prolonged course of protected weightbearing to assess if we could improve on historical outcomes. We also evaluated the efficacy of a vascularized medial femoral condyle (MFC) free flap to augment TTC arthrodesis. Methods: Fourteen adult patients underwent bone block TTC arthrodesis biologically augmented with fresh-frozen femoral head allograft, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and demineralized bone matrix cortical fibers. Three patients with soft tissue defects underwent vascularized reconstruction with an MFC free flap. Radiographic union, the Foot Function Index (FFI), and PROMIS pain interference (PI), and physical function (PF) scores were assessed at follow-up. Results: TTC fusion was documented on plain radiograph in 13 of 14 patients (92.9%) and CT in 10 of 11 patients (90.9%). Mean time to fusion was 183.2 ± 83.2 days. One patient (7.1%) experienced nonunion and persistent infection requiring amputation. Patients who underwent vascularized bone grafting had significantly shorter time to fusion (112.3 ± 31.7 days vs 204.4 ± 82.7 days, P = .05). Patient-reported outcomes revealed mild to moderate pain and dysfunction after 1 year (mean FFI = 41.0% ± 23.1%, PROMIS PI = 58.3 ± 1.8, PROMIS PF = 39.0 ± 2.2). Conclusion: In this relatively small series, the biologic augmentation of bone block TTC arthrodesis with osteoinductive agents and protective weightbearing resulted in excellent rates of fusion, modest pain, and preserved function of the lower extremity in almost all those treated. Osseous healing appears to be enhanced and accelerated with application of an MFC flap. We believe that this approach offers a viable salvage option for these challenging clinical problems. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
Objectives: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects approximately 12% of the population and leads to increased health care utilization and indirect costs exceeding $20 billion annually in the United States. The Lund-Mackay score (LMS) measures radiographic disease severity for CRS but poorly correlates with symptom scores. The association between LMS and health care utilization in CRS patients has not yet been investigated. The study aimed to assess the association between health care utilization and CRS radiographic severity using LMS.Methods: CRS patients enrolled in a clinical registry were evaluated. Nasal endoscopy findings and LMS were recorded for patients with sinus CT imaging. Patient symptom scores, demographic characteristics, and health care utilization measures were collected. The relationship between these factors and LMS was examined.Results: A total of 556 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 45.3 years, 53.4% were male, and 41.7% had nasal polyps. There was no difference in sex, smoking history, 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test scores, or past medical history factors between patients with high (≥8, n = 410) and low (<8, n = 146) LMS. Among high LMS patients, 73.7% underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) compared to 55.5% with low LMS (P < .01), and a greater percentage of patients had nasal polyps (49.3% vs 20.5%, P < .01). On multivariable logistic regression, high LMS patients used fewer antibiotic courses (OR: 0.68 [0.51-0.91]), but were more likely to be managed with ESS (OR: 2.28 [1.41-3.73]), and have nasal polyps ]) compared to low LMS patients. There was no significant difference in the number of steroid courses, over the counter pill use, provider visits, work/school days missed, or symptom duration between the two LMS groups.Conclusion: CRS patients with severe radiographic disease are more likely to have nasal polyps, undergo ESS, and take fewer antibiotic courses. However, there is no
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.