The purpose of this study was to retrospectively clarify the current status in Japan of TACE using Lipiodol together with anticancer agents to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively surveyed 4,659 (average annual total) procedures for HCC over the years 2002-2004 at 17 institutions included in the TACE Study Group of Japan. The survey included six questions that were related mainly to TACE and Lipiodol for HCC treatment. The most frequently applied among the 4,659 procedures at the 17 institutions were TACE (2,310; 50%) and local ablation (1,395; 30%). Five of the institutions applied 201-300 procedures and 4 applied 101-200. Lipiodol was used in "all procedures" and in "90% or more" at seven and nine institutions, respectively. Almost all institutions applied 4-6 (mean, 5) ml of Lipiodol during TACE to treat tumors 5 cm in diameter. In conclusion, this survey clarified that TACE using Lipiodol and anticancer agents is a popular option for HCC treatment in Japan.

The data demonstrate the high diagnostic value of digital radiography with a 4 million-pixel CCD for gastric cancers. The technique has considerable potential as an alternative to conventional gastrointestinal radiography.

We evaluated the effects of intraarterial injection of Adriamycin/ Mitomycin Coil (Lipiodol) suspension (ADMOS) alone and ADMOS+cis-diaminodichloroplatinum (CDDP) in 135 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 59 patients received ADMOS alone and 76 patients received ADMOS+CDDP (ADMOS/CDDP). Tumor size was reduced by over 25% in 13 (34%) of the evaluable 38 patients in the ADMOS-alone group and in 39 (51%) of the 76 evaluable patients in the ADMOS/CDDP group. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels decreased by more than 50% in 10 (59%) of 17 ADMOS-alone patients and in 23 (70%) of 33 ADMOS/CDDP patients whose pretreatment AFP levels were above 0.2 mg/I. The overall one-and 2-year survival rates were 68% and 41%, respectively. No severe complications and no significant changes in laboratory values were observed, except for one patient in the ADMOS/CDDP group who developed a liver abscess. Although the tumor response was significantly better in patients treated by ADMOS/CDDP than in those treated by ADMOS-alone (p<0.05), there was no significant difference in the survival rates between the 2 groups. The intraarterial injection of ADMOS and CDDP was concluded to be effective in treating HCC judging by tumor response.