The mechanism of pituitary tumour-associated headache remains undetermined. The significance of the presence of CGRP and SP in pituitary tumours is unknown but does not appear to be related to headache or endocrine activity of the tumour.
The aim of this study was to determine whether subcutaneous octreotide is effective for the treatment of acute migraine. Patients with migraine with and without aura as classified by the International Headache Society were recruited to a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. Patients were instructed to treat two attacks of at least moderate pain severity, with at least a 7 day interval, using subcutaneous 100 microg octreotide or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the headache response defined as: severe or moderate pain becomes mild or nil, at 2 h. The primary endpoint was analysed using a Multilevel Analysis approach. Secondary end-points included associated symptoms and a four-point functional disability score. The study was powered to detect a 30% difference at an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.8. A total of 51 patients were recruited, of whom 42 provided efficacy data on an attack treated with octreotide and 41 with placebo. Modelling the headache response as a binomial determined by treatment, using the patient as the level 2 variable, and considering a possible period effect, and sex and migraine type as other variables of interest, subcutaneous octreotide was not significantly superior to placebo. The two hour headache response rates were 20% for placebo and 14% for octreotide, whilst the two hour pain free rates were 7% and 2%, respectively. Subcutaneous octreotide 100 microg is not effective in the acute treatment of migraine when compared to placebo.
Patients with pituitary tumours often present with disabling headache but there is no clear relationship between tumour size and headache. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been identified in pituitary tumours and may serve as a biochemical marker of the propensity for headache. Using immunohistochemical techniques we examined 27 consecutive pituitary adenoma specimens for NPY (including one normal postmortem control anterior pituitary specimen). A separate observer divided the patients into two groups: headache and non-headache. The association between the presence of NPY and headache was tested. NPY positive immunoreactivity was seen in 13 tumour specimens (50%, 13 of 26 pituitary tumour specimens), characterized by cytoplasmic and nuclear staining patterns. There was no significant association between the presence of NPY and headache (chi(2) = 0.9, P = 0.34). We did not observe NPY in the normal anterior pituitary control specimen. NPY was present in four of five (80%) growth hormone-secreting tumours and two of two (100%) prolactinomas, compared with four of 11 (36%) non-functioning adenomas. The mechanism of many pituitary tumour-associated headaches remains undetermined. The significance of NPY positivity in pituitary tumours is unknown, although the results of this study may implicate this peptide in the control of somatotroph and lactotroph activity. Our data do not support a clear role for NPY pituitary tumour-associated headache.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.