Purpose: Most patients exhibiting psychiatric manifestations often remain undetected, misdiagnosed, and inappropriately managed. This cross-sectional study aims to ascertain the level of knowledge of mental illnesses among nonpsychiatric healthcare workers and their attitudes toward patients with mental illness in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in four public hospitals in Makkah from November 2017 to February 2018. A total of 407 participants were involved. A self-reported structured questionnaire was used, and data were collected electronically. Results: Of 407 respondents, 183 (45%) were females and 244 (55%) were males. The majority of respondents were physicians with medical specialties 116 (28.5%), followed by physicians with surgical specialties 99 (24.3%). More than half 229 (56.3%) of the respondents had work experience of >10 years. Although 128 (31.4%) of the participants lacked adequate knowledge of mental illnesses, only 104 (25.6%) had relevant knowledge.154 (37.8%) respondents displayed favorable (good) attitude, whereas 82 (44.7%) displayed an unfavorable (poor) attitude toward mentally ill patients. Conclusion: The study revealed that nearly one-fourth of the participants appear to have adequate knowledge of mental disorders. However, 44.7% have an unfavorable attitude toward patients with mental illnesses. Hence, respondent professionals markedly correlated with both knowledge and attitude toward patients with mental illnesses, and the positive attitude strongly correlated with having adequate knowledge.

Triple-negative breast cancer is a unique subtype among breast cancers. Management includes a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Psychiatric complications of the regimen have not been reported before. We present a case of acute psychosis after the second cycle of chemotherapy in a 42-year-old woman with triple-negative breast cancer. The patient presented with sudden irritability, agitation, disorganization in speech and behavior, and paranoia involving her coworkers conspiring against her and causing her trouble with the law for 4 days. She was in her usual state of health until after her second cycle of chemotherapy. This was the first presentation of psychotic symptoms in her life. She was conscious and oriented. There were no neurologic deficits. She denied any change in her mood and any features of hallucinations. She was uncooperative, restless, had flight of ideas, and persecutory delusions. The remainder of the examination was normal. An autoimmune process, nervous system infection, or psychosis secondary to the chemotherapy were suspected. Serum electrolytes and other biochemical parameters were normal. Imaging of the brain showed no signs of acute brain insults or intracranial metastasis. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis and culture showed no abnormality or growth. The work-up revealed that neurologic, infectious, or autoimmune causes of her psychotic symptoms were less likely. Thus, a diagnosis of psychosis secondary to chemotherapy was considered. Treatment was with paliperidone, risperidone, clonazepam, and sertraline. Over the course of treatment, she showed substantial improvement and completed all of the chemotherapy sessions without adverse effects. In summary, we report a case of a patient whose initial chemotherapy course was complicated by psychosis. Since the neurotoxic and psychiatric effects of chemotherapeutics are not yet sufficiently elucidated, our case emphasizes that early signs of behavioral changes in patients receiving chemotherapy should trigger comprehensive psychiatric evaluation and monitoring of the patient’s mental state.

There has been an increasing demand for psychiatric care in recent decades, and “telepsychiatry” was developed to meet these demands. It is a type of telemedicine in which they provide many medical services virtually, such as therapy, counseling, and medication management. Telepsychiatry has numerous advantages, including lower costs, reduced stigma, and improved continuity of care. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies in the western region of Saudi Arabia addressed patients satisfaction with telepsychiatry. This cross-sectional study aims to assess patient satisfaction in telepsychiatry in terms of accessibility and timeliness, appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety, and to see whether patient satisfaction affects their decision to use the service again in the future. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a prestructured survey on the basis of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-18, which is a validated questionnaire used to assess patients’ satisfaction with the services provided to them. From January 2021 to July 2021, all male and female psychiatric patients over the age of 18 years who had psychiatric virtual appointments were included in this study. This study included 182 patients, of whom 106 were female. Patients were generally satisfied with the telepsychiatry services; 56.6%, 81.9%, 86.8%, and 91.2% of the participants were satisfied with the access and timeliness, appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety, respectively, and a total of 58.3% either strongly agree or agree of the overall satisfaction level. Depression and anxiety disorders were the most common psychiatric diseases. The statistical analysis revealed no significant relationships between patients’ satisfaction and demographic characteristics. Telepsychiatry has been evaluated to meet the growing demand for psychiatric care; it also has significant advantages. Patients had an overall positive satisfaction level toward telepsychiatry service, and so the results of this study support the continuity of using telepsychiatry in the future. Further research area could include a comparison between patients’ and providers’ satisfaction levels with telepsychiatry.