Fine particulate matter (PM) air pollution and environmental temperatures influence cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent evidence suggests that several air pollutants can promote dyslipidemia; however, the impact of ambient PM and temperature on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) function remains unclear. We hypothesized that daily exposures to higher levels of ambient PM and colder outdoor temperatures would impair HDL functionality. Lipoproteins, serum cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC), and HDL oxidation markers were measured twice in 50 healthy adults (age 32.1 ± 9.6 years) living in southeast Michigan and associated with ambient and personal-level exposures using mixed models. Although previous 7-day mean outdoor temperature (4.4 ± 9.8°C) and PM levels (9.1 ± 1.8 µg/m) were low, higher ambient PM exposures (per 10 µg/m) were associated with significant increases in the total cholesterol-to-HDL-C ratio (rolling average lag days 1 and 2) as well as reductions in CEC by -1.93% (lag day 5, p = 0.022) and -1.62% (lag day 6, p = 0.032). Colder outdoor temperatures (per 10°C) were also associated with decreases in CEC from -0.62 to -0.63% (rolling average lag days 5 and 7, p = 0.027 and 0.028). Previous 24-hour personal-level PM and temperature exposures did not impact outcomes, nor were any exposures associated with changes in HDL-oxidation metrics. In conclusion, we provide the first evidence that ambient PM (even at low levels) and outdoor temperatures may influence serum CEC, a critical antiatherosclerotic HDL function.
Our findings demonstrate that short-term exposures to ambient PM2.5 in a highly polluted environment can promote elevations in BP even among healthy adults. The fact that no adverse hemodynamic responses were observed in a clean location supports the key public health importance of international efforts to improve air quality as part of the global battle against hypertension.
ImportanceAdverse posttraumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae after traumatic stress exposure are common and have higher incidence among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Pain, depression, avoidance of trauma reminders, reexperiencing trauma, anxiety, hyperarousal, sleep disruption, and nightmares have been reported. Wrist-wearable devices with accelerometers capable of assessing 24-hour rest-activity characteristics are prevalent and may have utility in measuring these outcomes.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether wrist-wearable devices can provide useful biomarkers for recovery after traumatic stress exposure.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsData were analyzed from a diverse cohort of individuals seen in the emergency department after experiencing a traumatic stress exposure, as part of the Advancing Understanding of Recovery After Trauma (AURORA) study. Participants recruited from 27 emergency departments wore wrist-wearable devices for 8 weeks, beginning in the emergency department, and completed serial assessments of neuropsychiatric symptoms. A total of 19 019 patients were screened. Of these, 3040 patients met study criteria, provided informed consent, and completed baseline assessments. A total of 2021 provided data from wrist-wearable devices, completed the 8-week assessment, and were included in this analysis. The data were randomly divided into 2 equal parts (n = 1010) for biomarker identification and validation. Data were collected from September 2017 to January 2020, and data were analyzed from May 2020 to November 2022.ExposuresParticipants were recruited for the study after experiencing a traumatic stress exposure (most commonly motor vehicle collision).Main Outcomes and MeasuresRest-activity characteristics were derived and validated from wrist-wearable devices associated with specific self-reported symptom domains at a point in time and changes in symptom severity over time.ResultsOf 2021 included patients, 1257 (62.2%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 35.8 (13.0) years. Eight wrist-wearable device biomarkers for symptoms of adverse posttraumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae exceeded significance thresholds in the derivation cohort. One of these, reduced 24-hour activity variance, was associated with greater pain severity (r = −0.14; 95% CI, −0.20 to −0.07). Changes in 6 rest-activity measures were associated with changes in pain over time, and changes in the number of transitions between sleep and wake over time were associated with changes in pain, sleep, and anxiety. Simple cutoffs for these biomarkers identified individuals with good recovery for pain (positive predictive value [PPV], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.88), sleep (PPV, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.67, and anxiety (PPV, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.80) with high predictive value.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that wrist-wearable device biomarkers may have utility as screening tools for pain, sleep, and anxiety symptom outcomes after trauma exposure in high-risk populations.
Environmental temperatures influence cardiovascular physiology. However, the majority of time is spent indoors, making outdoor-ambient temperatures inaccurate estimates of true exposures encountered by most individuals. We evaluated in 50 healthy adults the associations between previous 7-day outdoor-ambient (4 occasions) and prior 24-hour personal-level (2 occasions) environmental temperature exposures with blood pressure, heart rate variability, sleep parameters, and endothelial-dependent vasodilatation (brachial flow-mediated dilatation [FMD]) using generalized estimating equations. Participants (34 females; age, 32.1±9.6 years) had normal blood pressures (107.8±13.3/70.2 ± 9.4 mm Hg), FMD (7.4±2.8%), as well as sleep and HRV parameters. Mean 7-day outdoor-ambient (4.6±9.7 °C) differed from personal-level temperature exposures (22.0±3.0 °C). Colder outdoo r-ambient temperatures (per -10°C) over the previous 1-6 days (rolling averages) were associated with decreases in FMD: -0.57% (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.14% to 0.01%, p=0.055) to -0.62% (95%CI -1.07% to -0.18%, p=0.006). However, a 10°C decrease in personal-leve l temperature during the prior 24-hours was associated with a greater decrement in FMD: -2.44% (95%CI -4.74% to -0.13%, p=0.038). Both were also linearly related to FMD during all seasons and without a threshold temperature. Other endpoints were not significantly related to either temperature level in this study. Short-term exposures to colder environmental temperatures reduced endothelial-dependent vasodilatation, supporting the epidemiological associations with heightened cardiovascular risk. We show here for the first time that temperature exposures characterized at the personal-level may be more robust predictors of endothelial function than outdoor-ambient levels.
BackgroundSocial disparities in healthcare persist in the US despite the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. We investigated the causal impact of socioeconomic status on the quality of care in a setting with minimal confounding bias from race, insurance type, and access to care.MethodsWe designed a retrospective population-based study with a random 25% sample of adult Taiwan population enrolled in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance system from 2000 to 2016. Patient’s income levels were categorized into low-income group (<25th percentile) and high-income group (≥25th percentile). We used marginal structural modeling analysis to calculate the odds of hospital admissions for 11 ambulatory care sensitive conditions identified by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the odds of having an Elixhauser comorbidity index greater than zero for low-income patients.ResultsAmong 2,844,334 patients, those in lower-income group had 1.28 greater odds (95% CI 1.24–1.33) of experiencing preventable hospitalizations, and 1.04 greater odds (95% CI 1.03–1.05) of having a comorbid condition in comparison to high-income group.ConclusionsIncome was shown to be a causal factor in a patient’s health and a determinant of the quality of care received even with equitable access to care under a universal health insurance system. Policies focusing on addressing income as an important upstream causal determinant of health to provide support to patients in lower socioeconomic status will be effective in improving health outcomes for this vulnerable social stratum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.